From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCH] NETIF_F_LLTX for devices 2 Date: Sun, 12 Sep 2004 20:06:51 -0400 Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Message-ID: <4144E49B.80400@pobox.com> References: <20040908072408.GI27886@wotan.suse.de> <1094629677.1089.155.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20040908134713.1bcd46d3.davem@davemloft.net> <1094823215.1121.129.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20040911142116.GL4431@wotan.suse.de> <1094933731.2343.109.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20040911174535.2acbb957.davem@davemloft.net> <20040912100114.GB11484@havoc.gtf.org> <20040912102529.GA27096@wotan.suse.de> <20040912161604.GA23366@havoc.gtf.org> <1095010469.2344.215.camel@jzny.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Andi Kleen , "David S. Miller" , herbert@gondor.apana.org.au, netdev@oss.sgi.com Return-path: To: hadi@cyberus.ca In-Reply-To: <1095010469.2344.215.camel@jzny.localdomain> Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org jamal wrote: > On Sun, 2004-09-12 at 12:16, Jeff Garzik wrote: > > >>Thanks, but still need a patch for return value constants, otherwise you >>are compounding rather than addressing a current problem. > > > Something along the lines of attached patch? Yep, thanks, ACK. Jeff