From: Nivedita Singhvi <niv@us.ibm.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: John Heffner <jheffner@psc.edu>, ak@suse.de, netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: bad TSO performance in 2.6.9-rc2-BK
Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 14:16:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <415B2647.8080803@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040929140016.7ffa4e8b.davem@davemloft.net>
David S. Miller wrote:
> I think you hit the jackpot John... or at least you're
> on the right trail.
>
> It seems I'll have to do some send buffer liberation when
> we partially ACK TSO frames. Since that isn't happening
> currently, this window advancing test never passes until
> the full TSO frame is freed up at the sender side.
>
> Patch coming...
That was my point to Herbert, Dave - that we can't
rely on Nagle - either we're triggering too early
and not utilizing TSO MTU or we're triggering too
late (waiting for the full TSO frame) depending
on whether we use standard or TSO mss..
We need some heuristic to do partial sends under
TSO. Is that what you are addressing?
thanks,
Nivedita
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-09-29 21:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 97+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-09-20 6:30 bad TSO performance in 2.6.9-rc2-BK Anton Blanchard
2004-09-20 15:54 ` Nivedita Singhvi
2004-09-21 15:55 ` Anton Blanchard
2004-09-20 20:30 ` Andi Kleen
2004-09-21 22:58 ` David S. Miller
2004-09-22 14:00 ` Andi Kleen
2004-09-22 18:12 ` David S. Miller
2004-09-22 19:55 ` Andi Kleen
2004-09-22 20:07 ` Nivedita Singhvi
2004-09-22 20:30 ` David S. Miller
2004-09-22 20:56 ` Nivedita Singhvi
2004-09-22 21:56 ` Andi Kleen
2004-09-22 22:04 ` David S. Miller
2004-09-22 20:12 ` Andrew Grover
2004-09-22 20:39 ` David S. Miller
2004-09-22 22:06 ` Andi Kleen
2004-09-22 22:25 ` David S. Miller
2004-09-22 22:47 ` Andi Kleen
2004-09-22 22:50 ` David S. Miller
2004-09-23 23:11 ` David S. Miller
2004-09-23 23:41 ` Herbert Xu
2004-09-23 23:41 ` David S. Miller
2004-09-24 0:12 ` Herbert Xu
2004-09-24 0:40 ` Herbert Xu
2004-09-24 1:07 ` Herbert Xu
2004-09-24 1:17 ` David S. Miller
2004-09-27 1:27 ` Herbert Xu
2004-09-27 2:50 ` Herbert Xu
2004-09-27 4:00 ` David S. Miller
2004-09-27 5:45 ` Herbert Xu
2004-09-27 19:01 ` David S. Miller
2004-09-27 21:32 ` Herbert Xu
2004-09-28 21:10 ` David S. Miller
2004-09-28 21:34 ` Andi Kleen
2004-09-28 21:53 ` David S. Miller
2004-09-28 22:33 ` Andi Kleen
2004-09-28 22:57 ` David S. Miller
2004-09-28 23:27 ` Andi Kleen
2004-09-28 23:35 ` David S. Miller
2004-09-28 23:55 ` Andi Kleen
2004-09-29 0:04 ` David S. Miller
2004-09-29 20:58 ` John Heffner
2004-09-29 21:10 ` Nivedita Singhvi
2004-09-29 21:50 ` David S. Miller
2004-09-29 21:56 ` Andi Kleen
2004-09-29 23:29 ` David S. Miller
2004-09-29 23:51 ` John Heffner
2004-09-30 0:03 ` David S. Miller
2004-09-30 0:10 ` Herbert Xu
2004-10-01 0:34 ` David S. Miller
2004-10-01 1:12 ` David S. Miller
2004-10-01 3:40 ` David S. Miller
2004-10-01 10:35 ` Andi Kleen
2004-10-01 10:23 ` Andi Kleen
2004-09-30 0:10 ` John Heffner
2004-09-30 17:25 ` John Heffner
2004-09-30 20:23 ` David S. Miller
2004-09-30 0:05 ` Herbert Xu
2004-09-30 4:33 ` David S. Miller
2004-09-30 5:47 ` Herbert Xu
2004-09-30 7:39 ` David S. Miller
2004-09-30 8:09 ` Herbert Xu
2004-09-30 9:29 ` Andi Kleen
2004-09-30 20:20 ` David S. Miller
2004-09-29 3:27 ` John Heffner
2004-09-29 9:01 ` Andi Kleen
2004-09-29 19:56 ` David S. Miller
2004-09-29 20:56 ` Andi Kleen
2004-09-29 21:17 ` David S. Miller
2004-09-29 21:00 ` David S. Miller
2004-09-29 21:16 ` Nivedita Singhvi [this message]
2004-09-29 21:22 ` David S. Miller
2004-09-29 21:43 ` Andi Kleen
2004-09-29 21:51 ` John Heffner
2004-09-29 21:52 ` David S. Miller
2004-09-24 8:30 ` Andi Kleen
2004-09-27 22:38 ` John Heffner
2004-09-27 23:04 ` David S. Miller
2004-09-27 23:25 ` Andi Kleen
2004-09-27 23:37 ` David S. Miller
2004-09-27 23:51 ` Andi Kleen
2004-09-28 0:15 ` David S. Miller
2004-09-27 23:36 ` Herbert Xu
2004-09-28 0:13 ` David S. Miller
2004-09-28 0:34 ` Herbert Xu
2004-09-28 4:59 ` David S. Miller
2004-09-28 5:15 ` Herbert Xu
2004-09-28 5:58 ` David S. Miller
2004-09-28 6:45 ` Nivedita Singhvi
2004-09-28 7:20 ` Nivedita Singhvi
2004-09-28 20:38 ` David S. Miller
2004-09-28 7:23 ` Nivedita Singhvi
2004-09-28 8:23 ` Herbert Xu
2004-09-28 12:53 ` John Heffner
2004-09-22 20:28 ` David S. Miller
[not found] <Pine.NEB.4.33.0409301625560.13549-100000@dexter.psc.edu>
2004-10-02 1:32 ` John Heffner
2004-10-04 20:07 ` David S. Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=415B2647.8080803@us.ibm.com \
--to=niv@us.ibm.com \
--cc=ak@suse.de \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jheffner@psc.edu \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).