From: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix secure tcp sequence number generation
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2004 22:41:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41630713.2080606@colorfullife.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041005132724.6a913c48.davem@davemloft.net>
David S. Miller wrote:
>On Sat, 02 Oct 2004 20:10:22 +0200
>Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>>Description:
>>The tcp sequence number generator needs a random seed that is reset every
>>few minutes. Since the sequence numbers should be constantly increasing,
>>for each rekey 2^24 is added to the sequence number.
>>The actual use of the sequence number generator is lockless,
>>synchronization is achieved by having two copies of the control structure.
>>
>>The attached patch:
>>- fixes a race in rekey_seq_generator(): schedule_work doesn't
>> provide synchronization.
>>- Uses schedule_delayed_work() for the rekey: simplifies synchronization
>> and speeds up the hot path.
>>- replaces do_gettimeofday with get_seconds(): get_seconds is faster and
>> usec resolution is not required.
>>- removes tmpdata - not needed with new locking.
>>- Adds a late_initcall for the first initialization after boot.
>> init_call would be too early, I've checked that the late_initcall runs
>> before net/ipv4/ipconfig.c, i.e. the BOOTP/DHCP autoconfiguration.
>>
>>Signed-Off-By: Manfred Spraul <manfred@colorfullife.com>
>>
>>
>
>I like this patch, but you may have sent the wrong copy. You
>mention in the description that you changed over to use
>get_seconds(), yet the only reference to get_seconds() in the
>patch is:
>
>- keyptr = check_and_rekey(get_seconds());
>+ keyptr = get_keyptr();
>
>Please clarify that this is just a brain fart in the description
>and not the patch.
>
>
Right patch but wrong description, sorry:
I've recycled the description from the previous patch and that one used
get_seconds() in rekey_seq_generator(). Now rekey_seq_generator()
doesn't access the time at all, that's done within schedule_delayed_work().
--
Manfred
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-05 20:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-02 18:10 [PATCH] fix secure tcp sequence number generation Manfred Spraul
2004-10-03 22:00 ` David S. Miller
2004-10-04 4:06 ` Manfred Spraul
2004-10-05 20:27 ` David S. Miller
2004-10-05 20:41 ` Manfred Spraul [this message]
2004-10-05 21:31 ` David S. Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41630713.2080606@colorfullife.com \
--to=manfred@colorfullife.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).