From: P@draigBrady.com
To: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@wantstofly.org>
Cc: Robert Olsson <Robert.Olsson@data.slu.se>,
Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>,
"'netdev@oss.sgi.com'" <netdev@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.7 tulip performance (with NAPI)
Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2004 10:25:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41665CF9.3060001@draigBrady.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041007234413.GC24969@xi.wantstofly.org>
Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 07, 2004 at 11:11:47PM +0200, Robert Olsson wrote:
>
>
>> I'm interested if anyone has done any pktgen performance tests with
>> w. S2IO or other 10G card we need to upgrade the lab equipment.
>> Both 64 byte pkts and MTU sized pkts is interesting. Anyone?
>
>
> If you're interested in raw pps numbers and willing to use something
> other than pktgen to attain them, you might want to look into the intel
> IXP-based boards. You actually have to write some microcode and upload
> it to an on-chip processor array, but you can easily sustain wirespeed
> at 4Gbps (IXP2400-based) or 10Gbps (IXP2800-based.)
Good suggestion. This is exactly what I'm doing on a (2400 based)
radisys enp-2611 board. Faced with the cost of a smartbits it's
a no brainer for me. I haven't written the µ code yet btw.
Pádraig.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-08 9:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-05 23:42 2.6.7 tulip performance (with NAPI) Ben Greear
2004-10-06 19:21 ` Robert Olsson
2004-10-06 21:37 ` Ben Greear
2004-10-07 0:56 ` Ben Greear
2004-10-07 1:08 ` David S. Miller
2004-10-07 18:09 ` Ben Greear
2004-10-11 4:07 ` David S. Miller
2004-10-07 21:11 ` Robert Olsson
2004-10-07 21:47 ` Ben Greear
2004-10-07 22:13 ` Robert Olsson
2004-10-07 23:44 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2004-10-08 9:25 ` P [this message]
2004-10-08 9:28 ` Lennert Buytenhek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41665CF9.3060001@draigBrady.com \
--to=p@draigbrady.com \
--cc=Robert.Olsson@data.slu.se \
--cc=buytenh@wantstofly.org \
--cc=greearb@candelatech.com \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).