From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Brian Haley Subject: Re: [PATCH, TAKE 2] [IPV6] XFRM: extract xfrm_lookup() from ip6_dst_lookup() (is Re: [PATCH][IPv6] separation xfrm_lookup from ip6_dst_lookup) Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 14:09:29 -0400 Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Message-ID: <417E92D9.1050305@hp.com> References: <417D6FD0.7010903@hp.com> <20041026.125539.84990576.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> <417E5F37.4010501@hp.com> <20041027.004359.62730834.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com Return-path: To: yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org In-Reply-To: <20041027.004359.62730834.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / =E5=90=89=E8=97=A4=E8=8B=B1=E6=98=8E wrote: > First, in general, please do not mix two things. Sorry, next time I'll split the patch. > Second, because we're not ready to migrate. > Please do not do that (pushing it to the glibc people) until we're read= y. > We really need to do in consistent way; kernel header / glibc header, > and even with other systems. The kernel struct is the correct size (since addr[0] has no size),=20 ip6_rthdr0 in ip6.h is not, it's 128 bits too big. Let me know the=20 right steps to go through to correct this and I'll get it done, you can=20 send it off-line if you like. -Brian