From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Brian Haley Subject: Re: [PATCH, TAKE 2] [IPV6] XFRM: extract xfrm_lookup() from ip6_dst_lookup() (is Re: [PATCH][IPv6] separation xfrm_lookup from ip6_dst_lookup) Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 11:21:29 -0400 Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Message-ID: <417FBCF9.5070808@hp.com> References: <417E5F37.4010501@hp.com> <20041027.004359.62730834.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> <417E92D9.1050305@hp.com> <20041027.091039.56337914.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com Return-path: To: yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org In-Reply-To: <20041027.091039.56337914.yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org> Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org > Because we do not support RFC3542, extra 128bits is definitely correct. 2292 was deprecated by 3542 in May 2003, when do we plan on supporting it? I am willing to do this update, just please tell me the way you want me to go about it. Thanks, -Brian