From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: "Venkatesan, Ganesh" <ganesh.venkatesan@intel.com>,
netdev <netdev@oss.sgi.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH netdev-2.6 7/10] ixgb: Replace kmalloc with vmalloc to allocate driver local data structures
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2004 13:02:47 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <418277B7.7000705@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20041029130817.GA12301@infradead.org>
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 05:50:45AM -0700, Venkatesan, Ganesh wrote:
>
>>This is a trade-off between space allocated via kmalloc and vmalloc. My
>>understanding is that kmalloc space is more limited than vmalloc. Is
>>this incorrect?
>
>
> Yes. kmalloc space is only limited by the amount of free memory you have
> in your system, vmalloc has very low absolute limits (down to 64MB in
> some configurations)..
However, kmalloc() has much lower per-call limits than vmalloc().
I'm interested to see a VM person weigh in on this...
Drivers are certainly allowed to use vmalloc.
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-29 17:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-29 12:50 [PATCH netdev-2.6 7/10] ixgb: Replace kmalloc with vmalloc to allocate driver local data structures Venkatesan, Ganesh
2004-10-29 13:08 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-10-29 15:28 ` Jon Mason
2004-10-29 17:02 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2004-10-29 17:36 ` William Lee Irwin III
2004-10-29 18:26 ` Jeff Garzik
2004-10-29 18:29 ` William Lee Irwin III
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-10-29 15:35 Venkatesan, Ganesh
2004-10-29 16:41 ` Jon Mason
2004-10-29 12:11 Ganesh Venkatesan
2004-10-29 12:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=418277B7.7000705@pobox.com \
--to=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=ganesh.venkatesan@intel.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=wli@holomorphy.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).