Re: [PATCH net v4 2/3] net: ethernet: oa_tc6: Improvements to error recovery

[Parthiban Veerasooran <parthiban.veerasooran@microchip.com>]

Imperative mood for the subject: "Improve error recovery" (netdev 
convention).

On 21/07/26 7:50 am, Selvamani Rajagopal via B4 Relay wrote:
>   static int oa_tc6_prcs_rx_chunk_payload(struct oa_tc6 *tc6, u8 *data,
> @@ -931,8 +966,7 @@ static int oa_tc6_prcs_rx_chunk_payload(struct oa_tc6 *tc6, u8 *data,
>          /* Process the chunk with only rx frame end */
>          if (end_valid && !start_valid) {
>                  size = end_byte_offset + 1;
> -               oa_tc6_prcs_rx_frame_end(tc6, data, size);
> -               return 0;
> +               return oa_tc6_prcs_rx_frame_end(tc6, data, size);
>          }
> 
>          /* Process the chunk with previous rx frame end and next rx frame
> @@ -946,6 +980,14 @@ static int oa_tc6_prcs_rx_chunk_payload(struct oa_tc6 *tc6, u8 *data,
>                  if (tc6->rx_skb) {
>                          size = end_byte_offset + 1;
>                          oa_tc6_prcs_rx_frame_end(tc6, data, size);
oa_tc6_prcs_rx_frame_end() now returns int, but this drops the return — 
every other call in this patch propagates it. Is it deliberate?
> +
> +                       /* Purpose of rx_buf_overflow is make the
> +                        * code to look for new frame. At this
> +                        * stage, we have a new frame to process.
> +                        * So, making it false, in case it is set
> +                        * to true by oa_tc6_prcs_rx_frame_end.
> +                        */
> +                       tc6->rx_buf_overflow = false;
>                  }
>                  size = OA_TC6_CHUNK_PAYLOAD_SIZE - start_byte_offset;
>                  return oa_tc6_prcs_rx_frame_start(tc6,
> @@ -954,9 +996,7 @@ static int oa_tc6_prcs_rx_chunk_payload(struct oa_tc6 *tc6, u8 *data,
>          }
> 
>          /* Process the chunk with ongoing rx frame data */
> -       oa_tc6_prcs_ongoing_rx_frame(tc6, data, footer);
> -
> -       return 0;
> +       return oa_tc6_prcs_ongoing_rx_frame(tc6, data, footer);
footer is unused here. Either drop the unused parameter or a note why it
stays.

Best regards,
Parthiban V
>   }
>