From: James Ketrenos <jketreno@linux.intel.com>
To: Netdev <netdev@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Steps for netdev-2.6 inclusion?
Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2004 19:34:59 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41AE7143.80505@linux.intel.com> (raw)
Ok, its been a long time coming, but it appears the ipw* wireless drivers are to
the point where being more proactive at getting them into the kernel is
appropriate (at least based on the frequency of emails I'm getting of 'why isn't
this in mainline?')
So, what would be the set of steps required to get a version in the queue for
inclusion?
The drivers we have are the ipw2100 (supporting the Intel PRO/Wireless 2100
Network Connection adapter) and ipw2200 (supporting the Intel PRO/Wireless
2200BG and 2915ABG Network Connection adapters). There is also a shared generic
ieee 802.11 stack (ieee80211*.ko) supporting 802.11b, g, and a for BSS and IBSS
modes.
The ipw2100 recently was stamped 1.0.0, which means we've put it through a
validation and stabalization phase. As we want to try and ensure end users
don't have to spend all night fighting with their wireless connection just
because they've updated the kernel, we've adopted the following version
numbering scheme for the ipw* drivers in the form of of x.y.z, where:
.z increases from snapshot to snapshot (pushed out as tarballs on SourceForge)
.y increases (and sets .z to 0) when a snapshot has gone through a regression
validation cycle.
.x increases if there are significant functionality changes to the driver.
The idea is to then only have x.y.0 (stable/tested) versions go out for wider
distribution (kernel inclusion).
For those that are curious, the tip of development for the ipw2100, ipw2200, and
ieee80211 stack is available at bk://ipw.bkbits.net/ipw-2.6.
Given what I described above, would it be most appropriate to create a
ipw-2.6-stable bk tree with the parent as netdev-2.6 that we put the stable
versions of the ipw* drivers into, and then request that be pulled? The ipw-2.6
tree could then continue to represent the development tip. I've searched around
for some BKMs on this, but haven't found a whole lot.
The ipw2100 1.0.0 snapshot (and newer versions) can be found at
http://ipw2100.sf.net/#downloads. The latest ipw2200 snapshot (0.15) is
available at http://ipw2200.sf.net/#downloads.
Also, we have a Bugzilla database setup for the above drivers at
http://bughost.org for those that are curious about current remaining issues, etc.
Thanks,
James
next reply other threads:[~2004-12-02 1:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-12-02 1:34 James Ketrenos [this message]
2004-12-02 6:18 ` Steps for netdev-2.6 inclusion? Jeff Garzik
2004-12-02 20:11 ` James Ketrenos
2004-12-03 10:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-12-21 20:03 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-01-06 16:10 ` James Ketrenos
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41AE7143.80505@linux.intel.com \
--to=jketreno@linux.intel.com \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).