From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: P@draigBrady.com Subject: Re: 1.03Mpps on e1000 (was: Re: [E1000-devel] Transmission limit) Date: Mon, 06 Dec 2004 17:32:17 +0000 Message-ID: <41B497A1.6090600@draigBrady.com> References: <20041205174401.GJ647@xi.wantstofly.org> <20041205175133.GK647@xi.wantstofly.org> <1102332757.1042.2255.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20041206121151.GA12598@xi.wantstofly.org> <1102335643.1048.2311.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20041206122300.GA12763@xi.wantstofly.org> <1102338662.1042.2365.camel@jzny.localdomain> <20041206132907.GA13411@xi.wantstofly.org> <16820.37049.396306.295878@robur.slu.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Lennert Buytenhek , jamal , Martin Josefsson , Scott Feldman , mellia@prezzemolo.polito.it, Jorge Manuel Finochietto , Giulio Galante , netdev@oss.sgi.com Return-path: To: Robert Olsson In-Reply-To: <16820.37049.396306.295878@robur.slu.se> Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Robert Olsson wrote: > Lennert Buytenhek writes: > > On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 08:11:02AM -0500, jamal wrote: > >=20 > > > Hopefully someone will beat me to testing to see if our forwarding > > > capacity now goes up with this new recipe. >=20 >=20 > A breakthrough we now can send small packets at wire speed it will make= =20 > development and testing much easier... It surely will!! Just to recap, 2 people have been able to tx @ wire speed. The origonal poster was able to receive at wire speed, but could only TX at about 50% wire speed. It would be really cool if we could combine this to bridge @ wire speed. --=20 P=E1draig Brady - http://www.pixelbeat.org --