From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: hadi@znyx.com
Cc: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Thomas Cataldo <tomc@compaqnet.fr>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: Hard freeze with 2.6.10-rc3 and QoS, worked fine with 2.6.9
Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 06:17:17 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41B68E5D.2080009@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1102480913.1049.24.camel@jzny.localdomain>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1343 bytes --]
Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
>BTW, old kernel in this case implies one that does not support tc
>actions at all. So pick something like 2.4.28.
>New is whatever 2.6.x with patch.
>Old tc is something that for example ships with redhat
>new tc is whatever one is patched.
>
>Supplementary tests are: in 2.6.x to compile the policer
>in two different ways a) via tc actions and b) using the old scheme
>which is understood by "old" tc. Repeat the tests i described earlier
>with b) pretending to be "old" kernel.
>
>Infact come to think of it i would also prefer to have the suplementary
>tests run as well.
>If you guys have no cycles, please pass the patch to me and i will test
>on the weekend.
>
>
I think these tests are a waste of time. struct tcf_police is not
userspace-visible, so it's highly unlikely that the tc version matters.
Why an old kernel needs to be tested is beyond me. For possible in-kernel
breakage caused by the restructuring, without CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT,
struct tcf_police is only used in police.c, without any casts or
assumptions about layout, so I can't see what could break. With
CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT, the only place where it is used outside of
police.c is tcf_action_copy_stats, and this is exactly what this patch
(tested) fixes.
If you still want to do these test, please use the attached patch.
Regards
Patrick
[-- Attachment #2: x --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1479 bytes --]
===== include/net/act_api.h 1.4 vs edited =====
--- 1.4/include/net/act_api.h 2004-11-06 01:33:12 +01:00
+++ edited/include/net/act_api.h 2004-12-07 17:53:37 +01:00
@@ -8,15 +8,23 @@
#include <net/sch_generic.h>
#include <net/pkt_sched.h>
+#define tca_gen(name) \
+struct tcf_##name *next; \
+ u32 index; \
+ int refcnt; \
+ int bindcnt; \
+ u32 capab; \
+ int action; \
+ struct tcf_t tm; \
+ struct gnet_stats_basic bstats; \
+ struct gnet_stats_queue qstats; \
+ struct gnet_stats_rate_est rate_est; \
+ spinlock_t *stats_lock; \
+ spinlock_t lock
+
struct tcf_police
{
- struct tcf_police *next;
- int refcnt;
-#ifdef CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT
- int bindcnt;
-#endif
- u32 index;
- int action;
+ tca_gen(police);
int result;
u32 ewma_rate;
u32 burst;
@@ -24,33 +32,14 @@
u32 toks;
u32 ptoks;
psched_time_t t_c;
- spinlock_t lock;
struct qdisc_rate_table *R_tab;
struct qdisc_rate_table *P_tab;
-
- struct gnet_stats_basic bstats;
- struct gnet_stats_queue qstats;
- struct gnet_stats_rate_est rate_est;
- spinlock_t *stats_lock;
};
#ifdef CONFIG_NET_CLS_ACT
#define ACT_P_CREATED 1
#define ACT_P_DELETED 1
-#define tca_gen(name) \
-struct tcf_##name *next; \
- u32 index; \
- int refcnt; \
- int bindcnt; \
- u32 capab; \
- int action; \
- struct tcf_t tm; \
- struct gnet_stats_basic bstats; \
- struct gnet_stats_queue qstats; \
- struct gnet_stats_rate_est rate_est; \
- spinlock_t *stats_lock; \
- spinlock_t lock
struct tcf_act_hdr
{
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-12-08 5:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1102380430.6103.6.camel@buffy>
2004-12-07 6:35 ` Hard freeze with 2.6.10-rc3 and QoS, worked fine with 2.6.9 Patrick McHardy
2004-12-07 6:44 ` Andrew Morton
2004-12-07 12:29 ` jamal
2004-12-07 16:59 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-12-07 17:07 ` Thomas Graf
2004-12-07 17:23 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-12-08 4:27 ` jamal
2004-12-08 4:41 ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2004-12-08 5:17 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2004-12-08 12:31 ` jamal
2004-12-08 14:32 ` Thomas Graf
2004-12-08 14:59 ` Thomas Graf
2004-12-08 15:06 ` jamal
2004-12-08 15:05 ` jamal
2004-12-08 17:30 ` Thomas Graf
2004-12-08 5:30 ` David S. Miller
2004-12-08 12:04 ` jamal
2004-12-08 16:57 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-12-08 19:30 ` Stephen Hemminger
2004-12-08 19:49 ` jamal
2004-12-08 21:21 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-12-08 22:07 ` Stephen Hemminger
2004-12-08 22:26 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-12-08 19:44 ` jamal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41B68E5D.2080009@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hadi@znyx.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=tgraf@suug.ch \
--cc=tomc@compaqnet.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).