From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: Hard freeze with 2.6.10-rc3 and QoS, worked fine with 2.6.9 Date: Wed, 08 Dec 2004 17:57:07 +0100 Message-ID: <41B73263.4040706@trash.net> References: <1102380430.6103.6.camel@buffy> <20041206224441.628e7885.akpm@osdl.org> <1102422544.1088.98.camel@jzny.localdomain> <41B5E188.5050800@trash.net> <20041207170748.GF1371@postel.suug.ch> <41B5E722.2080600@trash.net> <20041207213053.6bb602c1.davem@davemloft.net> <1102507470.1051.27.camel@jzny.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "David S. Miller" , tgraf@suug.ch, akpm@osdl.org, tomc@compaqnet.fr, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com Return-path: To: hadi@cyberus.ca In-Reply-To: <1102507470.1051.27.camel@jzny.localdomain> Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org jamal wrote: >I can almost guarantee that one or more of those tests i outlined would >fail. So i would suggest a revert until the testing has been done. > Please be more specific than an "almost guarantee" that "one or more tests" may fail when asking to revert a patch that fixes an easily triggerable crash. For example, point to the code that makes you think it might fail.