From: Tomas Carnecky <tom@dbservice.com>
To: Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org>
Cc: linux-os@analogic.com, Bill Davidsen <davidsen@tmr.com>,
James Morris <jmorris@redhat.com>,
Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
Bryan Fulton <bryan@coverity.com>,
netdev@oss.sgi.com, netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Coverity] Untrusted user data in kernel
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2004 20:39:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41C335FA.2050009@dbservice.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200412172030.04831.oliver@neukum.org>
Oliver Neukum wrote:
>>But the difference between you example (cp /dev/zero /dev/mem) and
>>passing unchecked data to the kernel is... you _can_ check the data and
>
>
> This is the difference:
> static int open_port(struct inode * inode, struct file * filp)
> {
> return capable(CAP_SYS_RAWIO) ? 0 : -EPERM;
> }
> (from mem.c)
>
OK, but my point was, whenever you can check the 'contents' of the data
passed to the kernel, do it. You can't check if the data someone writes
to /dev/mem is valid or not, but you can check for out-of-range/etc.
data in ioctl & friends.
tom
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-12-17 19:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1103247211.3071.74.camel@localhost.localdomain>
2004-12-17 5:15 ` [Coverity] Untrusted user data in kernel James Morris
2004-12-17 5:25 ` Patrick McHardy
2004-12-17 6:45 ` James Morris
2004-12-17 13:18 ` Tomas Carnecky
2004-12-17 19:16 ` David S. Miller
2004-12-17 19:34 ` Tomas Carnecky
2004-12-17 19:30 ` David S. Miller
2004-12-17 15:47 ` Bill Davidsen
2004-12-17 16:11 ` linux-os
2004-12-17 16:31 ` Oliver Neukum
2004-12-17 18:37 ` Bill Davidsen
2004-12-17 19:18 ` Tomas Carnecky
2004-12-17 19:30 ` Oliver Neukum
2004-12-17 19:39 ` Tomas Carnecky [this message]
2004-12-18 1:42 ` Horst von Brand
2004-12-17 15:10 ` Pavel Machek
2004-12-17 15:38 ` James Morris
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41C335FA.2050009@dbservice.com \
--to=tom@dbservice.com \
--cc=bryan@coverity.com \
--cc=davidsen@tmr.com \
--cc=jmorris@redhat.com \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-os@analogic.com \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
--cc=oliver@neukum.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).