From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Peter Bieringer <pb@bieringer.de>
Cc: Maillist netdev <netdev@oss.sgi.com>,
Netfilter development mailing list
<netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org>,
USAGI core <usagi-core@linux-ipv6.org>,
Harald Welte <laforge@gnumonks.org>
Subject: Re: ip6tables: accept of IPv6 transport esp packages not possible - no rule matches
Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 12:42:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <41D7DE3E.2090304@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <85346B5DA83795C08812E782@worker.muc.bieringer.de>
Peter Bieringer wrote:
>>Does this patch fix the problem ?
>>
> Yes, this patch fix the problem on the incoming side:
Thanks.
>
> I ping6 to a remote host via IPsec in transport mode:
>
> IPv6 INPUT chain:
>
> 0 0 ACCEPT icmpv6 * * ::/0 ::/0
> ipv6-icmp type 128
> 0 0 ACCEPT icmpv6 * * ::/0 ::/0
> ipv6-icmp type 129
> 1 156 ACCEPT esp * * remote/128 local/128
> 0 0 ACCEPT all * * remote/128 local/128
>
>
> So the proper chain matches.
>
>
> But I wonder a little bit because of the result of the OUTPUT chain:
>
> 0 0 ACCEPT icmpv6 * * ::/0 ::/0
> ipv6-icmp type 129
> 1 104 ACCEPT icmpv6 * * ::/0 ::/0
> ipv6-icmp type 128
> 0 0 ACCEPT esp * * local/128 remote/128
> 0 0 ACCEPT all * * local/128 remote/128
>
>
> Here, the ICMPv6 rule matches.
>
> This means for me that the traffic goes like this:
>
> OUTPUT: ping6 -> netfilter -> encryption -> ESP
> INPUT : ESP -> netfilter -> decryption -> ping6
More specific, with transport mode it goes:
OUTPUT: ping6 -> LOCAL_OUT -> encryption -> POST_ROUTING
INPUT: ESP -> PRE_ROUTING -> LOCAL_IN -> decryption -> ping6
Filtering for IPv6 happens on LOCAL_IN/LOCAL_OUT (and FORWARD).
> Is this logical?
Not very. Patches to improve this for IPv4 will be submitted
next week, but IPv6 still needs some work.
>
> BTW: how to filter incoming traffic after decryption?
Use tunnel-mode. The decrypted packets will hit PRE_ROUTING
and LOCAL_IN again.
Regards
Patrick
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-01-02 11:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-12-24 9:45 ip6tables: accept of IPv6 transport esp packages not possible - no rule matches Peter Bieringer
2004-12-24 15:59 ` Peter Bieringer
2004-12-25 15:46 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-01-02 9:01 ` Peter Bieringer
2005-01-02 11:42 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2005-01-02 12:15 ` Peter Bieringer
2005-01-02 21:14 ` Patrick McHardy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=41D7DE3E.2090304@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=laforge@gnumonks.org \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
--cc=pb@bieringer.de \
--cc=usagi-core@linux-ipv6.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).