netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Peter Bieringer <pb@bieringer.de>
Cc: Maillist netdev <netdev@oss.sgi.com>,
	Netfilter development mailing list
	<netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org>,
	USAGI core <usagi-core@linux-ipv6.org>,
	Harald Welte <laforge@gnumonks.org>
Subject: Re: ip6tables: accept of IPv6 transport esp packages not possible - no rule matches
Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2005 12:42:54 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <41D7DE3E.2090304@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <85346B5DA83795C08812E782@worker.muc.bieringer.de>

Peter Bieringer wrote:
>>Does this patch fix the problem ?
>>
> Yes, this patch fix the problem on the incoming side:

Thanks.

> 
> I ping6 to a remote host via IPsec in transport mode:
> 
> IPv6 INPUT chain:
> 
>     0     0 ACCEPT     icmpv6    *      *       ::/0                 ::/0
> ipv6-icmp type 128
>     0     0 ACCEPT     icmpv6    *      *       ::/0                 ::/0
> ipv6-icmp type 129
>     1   156 ACCEPT     esp      *      *       remote/128  local/128
>     0     0 ACCEPT     all      *      *       remote/128  local/128
> 
> 
> So the proper chain matches.
> 
> 
> But I wonder a little bit because of the result of the OUTPUT chain:
> 
>     0     0 ACCEPT     icmpv6    *      *       ::/0                 ::/0
> ipv6-icmp type 129
>     1   104 ACCEPT     icmpv6    *      *       ::/0                 ::/0
> ipv6-icmp type 128
>     0     0 ACCEPT     esp      *      *       local/128  remote/128
>     0     0 ACCEPT     all      *      *       local/128  remote/128
> 
> 
> Here, the ICMPv6 rule matches.
> 
> This means for me that the traffic goes like this:
> 
> OUTPUT: ping6 -> netfilter -> encryption -> ESP
> INPUT : ESP -> netfilter -> decryption -> ping6

More specific, with transport mode it goes:

OUTPUT: ping6 -> LOCAL_OUT -> encryption -> POST_ROUTING
INPUT: ESP -> PRE_ROUTING -> LOCAL_IN -> decryption -> ping6

Filtering for IPv6 happens on LOCAL_IN/LOCAL_OUT (and FORWARD).

> Is this logical?

Not very. Patches to improve this for IPv4 will be submitted
next week, but IPv6 still needs some work.

> 
> BTW: how to filter incoming traffic after decryption?

Use tunnel-mode. The decrypted packets will hit PRE_ROUTING
and LOCAL_IN again.

Regards
Patrick

  reply	other threads:[~2005-01-02 11:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-12-24  9:45 ip6tables: accept of IPv6 transport esp packages not possible - no rule matches Peter Bieringer
2004-12-24 15:59 ` Peter Bieringer
2004-12-25 15:46   ` Patrick McHardy
2005-01-02  9:01     ` Peter Bieringer
2005-01-02 11:42       ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2005-01-02 12:15         ` Peter Bieringer
2005-01-02 21:14           ` Patrick McHardy

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=41D7DE3E.2090304@trash.net \
    --to=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=laforge@gnumonks.org \
    --cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
    --cc=pb@bieringer.de \
    --cc=usagi-core@linux-ipv6.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).