From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6] typhoon: fix PCI enable, add port IO option Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2005 02:23:54 -0500 Message-ID: <41DE390A.2050002@pobox.com> References: <1101535273.4734.3.camel@ori.thedillows.org> <41DE0648.6090302@pobox.com> <1105079709.6202.4.camel@ori.thedillows.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Netdev Return-path: To: David Dillow In-Reply-To: <1105079709.6202.4.camel@ori.thedillows.org> Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org David Dillow wrote: > On Thu, 2005-01-06 at 22:47 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: > >>David Dillow wrote: >> >>>Jeff, please do a >>> >>> bk pull http://typhoon.bkbits.net/typhoon-2.6 >> >>Unfortunately, I can't pull this since it is not based on vanilla >>upstream 2.6.x. > > > Heh, I based it off netdev-2.6 at the time, because, IIRC, there were > changes in it that hadn't been pushed to Linus yet, and hadn't come > through me to be picked up in my tree. (There may be a way for me to do > it, I didn't try very hard.) it's a natural guess to base it off of netdev-2.6, but that's mainly for people who send patches. For BitKeeper, it's better to base it off a vanilla linux-2.6 tree. >>Can you please re-create your typhoon repository, based only on Linus's >>2.6.x? > > > Sure thing, it is there now. Content hasn't changed from the broken-out > patches I sent earlier, but I broke the file deltas into changesets of > their own. thanks, pulled. Jeff