From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Chris Leech" Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] [I/OAT] DMA memcpy subsystem Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2006 11:39:54 -0800 Message-ID: <41b516cb0603061139qeb60783md1b088ffaa216bf2@mail.gmail.com> References: <20060303214036.11908.10499.stgit@gitlost.site> <20060303214220.11908.75517.stgit@gitlost.site> <20060303.174048.14793187.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: To: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <20060303.174048.14793187.davem@davemloft.net> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On 3/3/06, David S. Miller wrote: > > +static spinlock_t dma_list_lock; > > Please use DEFINE_SPINLOCK(). > > > +static void dma_chan_free_rcu(struct rcu_head *rcu) { > > Newline before the brace please. > > > +static void dma_async_device_cleanup(struct kref *kref) { > > Newline before the brace please. > > > +struct dma_chan_percpu > > +{ > > Left brace on the same line as "struct dma_chan_percpu" please. > > > +struct dma_chan > > +{ > > Similarly. > > Otherwise this patch looks mostly ok. Thanks Dave, I'll apply these and other feedback and get updated patches generated. - Chris