From: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
To: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Steen Hegelund <Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com>,
UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>,
Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@microchip.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: sparx5/lan969x: fix PTP clock max_adj value
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2026 19:04:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42049f4d-8258-4d9a-840c-a2d2eafc6bf6@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260212-sparx5-ptp-max-adj-v2-v1-1-06b200e50ce3@microchip.com>
Hi Daniel,
On 12/02/2026 12:02, Daniel Machon wrote:
> The max_adj field in ptp_clock_info tells userspace how much the PHC
> clock frequency can be adjusted. ptp4l reads this and will never request
> a correction larger than max_adj.
>
> On both sparx5 and lan969x the clock offset may never converge because
> the servo needs a frequency correction larger than the current max_adj
> of 200000 (200 ppm) allows. The servo rails at the max and the offset
> stays in the tens of microseconds.
>
> The hardware has no inherent max adjustment limit; frequency correction
> is done by writing a 64-bit clock period increment to CLK_PER_CFG, and
> the register has plenty of range. The 200000 value was just an overly
> conservative software limit. The max_adj is shared between sparx5 and
> lan969x, and the increased value is safe for both.
>
> Fix this by increasing max_adj to 10000000 (10000 ppm), giving the
> servo sufficient headroom.
That's arbitrary, but looks like there's plenty of other drivers that do
similar things :)
> Fixes: 0933bd04047c ("net: sparx5: Add support for ptp clocks")
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Machon <daniel.machon@microchip.com>
Reviewed-by: Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com>
Maxime
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-12 18:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-02-12 11:02 [PATCH net] net: sparx5/lan969x: fix PTP clock max_adj value Daniel Machon
2026-02-12 18:04 ` Maxime Chevallier [this message]
2026-02-13 20:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42049f4d-8258-4d9a-840c-a2d2eafc6bf6@bootlin.com \
--to=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
--cc=Steen.Hegelund@microchip.com \
--cc=UNGLinuxDriver@microchip.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=daniel.machon@microchip.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horatiu.vultur@microchip.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox