jamal wrote:

>I should have caught that output missing divisor ;->
>Dave please apply Patricks version. Should probably apply cleanly on
>2.4.x as well.
>
My last patch has a similar problem, new hash tables added with
"u32 divisor .." are skipped while walking. This patch is better
tested and should be fine. Applies to 2.4 and 2.6.

Regards
Patrick