From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Stephen Smalley <sds@epoch.ncsc.mil>
Cc: Linux Audit Discussion <linux-audit@redhat.com>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serue@us.ibm.com>,
netdev@oss.sgi.com, davem@davemloft.net, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add audit uid to netlink credentials
Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 15:10:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <420A19C0.4070402@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1107956079.17568.42.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil>
Stephen Smalley wrote:
>On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 01:04, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>
>
>>Reception of netlink messages in the kernel happens in the context
>>of the sending process, so you can simply call
>>audit_get_loginuid(current->audit_context) in audit_receive_msg().
>>
>>
>
>Then why does netlink_sendmsg() need to save the effective capability
>set of the sender in the control buffer (via security_netlink_send) for
>later checking by other receive functions in the kernel (via
>security_netlink_recv)?
>
It looks like it doesn't need to, I guess it was copied from
netlink_sendmsg.
netlink transmission to userspace is asynchronous, some values need to be
saved, but userspace->kernel transmission is synchronous.
>What prevents audit_receive() or other similar
>receive functions in the kernel from processing messages sent by
>multiple senders?
>
Multiple messages from multiple senders are handled by multiple calls to
the input function. Check netlink_kernel_create() and netlink_data_ready().
Regards
Patrick
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-09 14:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-04 16:58 [PATCH] Add audit uid to netlink credentials Serge E. Hallyn
2005-02-08 6:04 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-02-09 13:34 ` Stephen Smalley
2005-02-09 14:10 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2005-02-09 14:19 ` Alexey Kuznetsov
2005-02-09 16:49 ` Alexey Kuznetsov
2005-02-09 18:52 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-02-09 18:53 ` Stephen Smalley
2005-02-09 14:17 ` David Woodhouse
2005-02-09 14:50 ` Serge Hallyn
2005-02-09 18:23 ` Stephen Smalley
2005-02-09 18:37 ` Chris Wright
2005-02-09 18:40 ` Stephen Smalley
2005-02-09 23:38 ` Chris Wright
2005-02-09 23:56 ` David Woodhouse
2005-02-10 0:19 ` Chris Wright
2005-02-10 9:20 ` David Woodhouse
2005-02-10 12:40 ` Stephen Smalley
2005-02-10 12:49 ` David Woodhouse
2005-02-10 17:14 ` Chris Wright
2005-02-10 1:11 ` Chris Wright
2005-02-10 12:36 ` Stephen Smalley
2005-02-10 12:51 ` Stephen Smalley
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-02-10 14:37 Chad Hanson
2005-02-10 14:56 ` David Woodhouse
2005-02-10 17:52 ` Klaus Weidner
2005-02-10 18:10 ` Casey Schaufler
2005-02-10 19:26 ` Klaus Weidner
2005-02-10 15:16 Chad Hanson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=420A19C0.4070402@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
--cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=sds@epoch.ncsc.mil \
--cc=serue@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).