From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Randy.Dunlap" Subject: Re: [PATCH] ieee80211 subsystem Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 20:36:49 -0800 Message-ID: <420AE4E1.7070204@osdl.org> References: <4203C32A.70402@linux.intel.com> <420828A9.7060306@osdl.org> <42087751.3040806@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com To: James Ketrenos In-Reply-To: <42087751.3040806@linux.intel.com> Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org James Ketrenos wrote: > Randy.Dunlap wrote: > >> James Ketrenos wrote: >> >>> Attached is the patch against 2.6.11-rc3-mm1 that adds the ieee80211 >>> subsystem used by the ipw2100 and ipw2200 projects. >>> >>> I'll be sending out the patches for ipw2100-1.0.0 and ipw2200-1.0.0 >>> that use thist stack to the list on Monday. >>> >>> In terms of what the stack currently does: >>> >>> * HW independent -- it only knows about 802.11 data and structures >>> * Performs an 802.3 <-> 802.11 transform for data Tx/Rx >>> * Host based support for fragmentation, WEP, and WPA using the >>> kernel's crypto functions >>> * Beacon and probe response collection and parsing >>> * Default implementation of some of the WE handlers that can be >>> managed without hardware knowledge >>> >>> We are working to merge in Dave Miller's p80211 code into the >>> ieee80211 subsystem so that it hooks into the kernel as a true >>> network layer as opposed to a mutated offspring of ethernet. >>> Once that is done, hopefully the skb to txb code can be reworked and >>> 802.11 fragments can be treated either as normal skbs, or skbs can be >>> modified to directly support them (ideally so that encrypted 802.11 >>> frames in support of IP packets can be cached by the stack instead of >>> having to be re-encrypted on TCP retries) >>> >>> Support for HW/FW crypto and fragmentation offload, in a HW >>> independent fashion, is also on the short-term list. >>> >>> When you look through the patch you'll likely notice the #ifdef >>> NOTYET/#endif sequences surrounding portions of code from the hostap >>> project. Portions of this subsystem were based on an earlier version >>> of the hostap project. Those areas that weren't directly supported >>> by the ipw* projects weren't ported to be completely hardware >>> independent (since I don't have the hardware to test it), and so are >>> still wrapped in the ifdefs. These sections mainly cover support for >>> MASTER and WDS modes. >>> >>> Anyway, please let me know what you think. Hopefully I built the >>> patch right... >> >> >> >> James, >> Can you post a patch that will build? or did you just want >> feedback on the current state of the patch? > > > Ah; I see my tree that I did the diff on was missing the > wireless/Makefile and the ieee80211/ieee80211_module.c to create the > patch against... sigh. Attached is ieee80211_module.c; you have the > change for the Makefile to include ieee80211. > Later {hopefully today} I'll send a full patch that includes several of > the corrections you called out in your prior patch. Now missing ieee80211_crypt.h (#included in the new ieee80211.h). Apparently still needing a complete diff. + /* Add the ESSID */ + iwe.cmd = SIOCGIWESSID; + iwe.u.data.flags = 1; + if (network->flags & NETWORK_EMPTY_ESSID) { Lines 2-3 above use spaces (e.g.) -- please use tabs. -- ~Randy