From: Pablo Neira <pablo@eurodev.net>
To: Chris Wright <chrisw@osdl.org>
Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com, davem@davemloft.net, jmorris@redhat.com,
sds@epoch.ncsc.mil, serue@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/3] netlink check sender, audit
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2005 23:19:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4212757D.5070401@eurodev.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050215034708.GG27645@shell0.pdx.osdl.net>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 395 bytes --]
Chris Wright wrote:
>Great, thanks. This is technically racy. It's possible (albeit small
>window) that something could be delivered before this is set.
>
Yes, hard trigger but that can happen and doesn't tell too much in
favour of me.
>Using a callback struct during registration would fix this.
>
>
I agree, maybe something like the example patch attached. Hope that helps.
--
Pablo
[-- Attachment #2: x --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 4161 bytes --]
===== net/netlink/af_netlink.c 1.69 vs edited =====
--- 1.69/net/netlink/af_netlink.c 2005-01-21 21:25:32 +01:00
+++ edited/net/netlink/af_netlink.c 2005-02-15 23:10:47 +01:00
@@ -71,6 +71,7 @@
struct netlink_callback *cb;
spinlock_t cb_lock;
void (*data_ready)(struct sock *sk, int bytes);
+ int (*check_sender)(struct sk_buff *skb);
};
#define nlk_sk(__sk) ((struct netlink_opt *)(__sk)->sk_protinfo)
@@ -636,9 +637,16 @@
int netlink_sendskb(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, int protocol)
{
struct netlink_opt *nlk;
- int len = skb->len;
+ int err, len = skb->len;
+
+ nlk = nlk_sk(sk);
+
+ if (nlk->check_sender)
+ if ((err = nlk->check_sender(skb))) {
+ netlink_detachskb(sk, skb);
+ return err;
+ }
- nlk = nlk_sk(sk);
#ifdef NL_EMULATE_DEV
if (nlk->handler) {
skb_orphan(skb);
@@ -1033,7 +1041,7 @@
*/
struct sock *
-netlink_kernel_create(int unit, void (*input)(struct sock *sk, int len))
+netlink_kernel_create(int unit, struct netlink_ops *nlops)
{
struct socket *sock;
struct sock *sk;
@@ -1053,8 +1061,12 @@
}
sk = sock->sk;
sk->sk_data_ready = netlink_data_ready;
- if (input)
- nlk_sk(sk)->data_ready = input;
+ if (nlops != NULL) {
+ if (nlops->input)
+ nlk_sk(sk)->data_ready = nlops->input;
+ if (nlops->check_sender)
+ nlk_sk(sk)->check_sender = nlops->check_sender;
+ }
if (netlink_insert(sk, 0)) {
sock_release(sock);
===== include/linux/netlink.h 1.23 vs edited =====
--- 1.23/include/linux/netlink.h 2005-02-07 06:59:39 +01:00
+++ edited/include/linux/netlink.h 2005-02-15 22:53:01 +01:00
@@ -115,8 +115,13 @@
#define NETLINK_CB(skb) (*(struct netlink_skb_parms*)&((skb)->cb))
#define NETLINK_CREDS(skb) (&NETLINK_CB((skb)).creds)
+struct netlink_ops
+{
+ void (*input)(struct sock *sk, int len);
+ int (*check_sender)(struct sk_buff *skb);
+};
-extern struct sock *netlink_kernel_create(int unit, void (*input)(struct sock *sk, int len));
+extern struct sock *netlink_kernel_create(int unit, struct netlink_ops *nlops);
extern void netlink_ack(struct sk_buff *in_skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh, int err);
extern int netlink_unicast(struct sock *ssk, struct sk_buff *skb, __u32 pid, int nonblock);
extern int netlink_broadcast(struct sock *ssk, struct sk_buff *skb, __u32 pid,
===== net/core/rtnetlink.c 1.33 vs edited =====
--- 1.33/net/core/rtnetlink.c 2005-01-10 22:42:22 +01:00
+++ edited/net/core/rtnetlink.c 2005-02-15 23:08:05 +01:00
@@ -462,8 +462,32 @@
static struct rtattr **rta_buf;
static int rtattr_max;
-/* Process one rtnetlink message. */
+static int rtnetlink_check_sender(struct sk_buff *skb)
+{
+ struct nlmsghdr *nlh;
+ int kind;
+ int type;
+
+ if (skb->len < NLMSG_LENGTH(0))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ nlh = (struct nlmsghdr *)skb->data;
+ type = nlh->nlmsg_type;
+
+ /* Unknown message: reply with EINVAL */
+ if (type > RTM_MAX)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ type -= RTM_BASE;
+ kind = type&3;
+ if (kind != 2 && !capable(CAP_NET_ADMIN))
+ return -EPERM;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+/* Process one rtnetlink message. */
static __inline__ int
rtnetlink_rcv_msg(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nlmsghdr *nlh, int *errp)
{
@@ -485,10 +509,6 @@
if (type < RTM_BASE)
return 0;
- /* Unknown message: reply with EINVAL */
- if (type > RTM_MAX)
- goto err_inval;
-
type -= RTM_BASE;
/* All the messages must have at least 1 byte length */
@@ -509,11 +529,6 @@
sz_idx = type>>2;
kind = type&3;
- if (kind != 2 && security_netlink_recv(skb)) {
- *errp = -EPERM;
- return -1;
- }
-
if (kind == 2 && nlh->nlmsg_flags&NLM_F_DUMP) {
u32 rlen;
@@ -681,6 +696,10 @@
void __init rtnetlink_init(void)
{
int i;
+ struct netlink_ops rtnl_ops = {
+ .input = rtnetlink_rcv,
+ .check_sender = rtnetlink_check_sender
+ };
rtattr_max = 0;
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(rta_max); i++)
@@ -690,7 +709,7 @@
if (!rta_buf)
panic("rtnetlink_init: cannot allocate rta_buf\n");
- rtnl = netlink_kernel_create(NETLINK_ROUTE, rtnetlink_rcv);
+ rtnl = netlink_kernel_create(NETLINK_ROUTE, &rtnl_ops);
if (rtnl == NULL)
panic("rtnetlink_init: cannot initialize rtnetlink\n");
netlink_set_nonroot(NETLINK_ROUTE, NL_NONROOT_RECV);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-15 22:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-12 9:01 [RFC][PATCH 0/3] netlink check sender Chris Wright
2005-02-12 9:02 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/3] " Chris Wright
2005-02-12 9:05 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/3] netlink check sender, audit Chris Wright
2005-02-12 9:06 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/3] netlink check sender, rtnetlink Chris Wright
2005-02-12 16:48 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/3] netlink check sender, audit Pablo Neira
2005-02-12 21:41 ` Pablo Neira
2005-02-14 13:08 ` Stephen Smalley
2005-02-15 0:13 ` Chris Wright
2005-02-15 2:29 ` Pablo Neira
2005-02-15 2:36 ` Pablo Neira
2005-02-15 3:47 ` Chris Wright
2005-02-15 22:19 ` Pablo Neira [this message]
2005-02-15 22:22 ` Chris Wright
2005-02-15 22:27 ` Pablo Neira
2005-02-16 0:11 ` Chris Wright
2005-02-16 3:42 ` James Morris
2005-02-15 0:11 ` Chris Wright
2005-02-14 12:59 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/3] netlink check sender Stephen Smalley
2005-02-14 13:05 ` Stephen Smalley
2005-02-15 0:22 ` Chris Wright
2005-02-15 0:17 ` Chris Wright
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4212757D.5070401@eurodev.net \
--to=pablo@eurodev.net \
--cc=chrisw@osdl.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jmorris@redhat.com \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=sds@epoch.ncsc.mil \
--cc=serue@us.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).