From: Christian Schmid <webmaster@rapidforum.com>
To: Matthias-Christian Ott <matthias.christian@tiscali.de>
Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: ARGH MORE BUGS!!!
Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 21:25:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <421A43BE.6080604@rapidforum.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <421A4244.9090908@tiscali.de>
netdev@oss.sgi.com has been found in MAINTAINERS in the ipv4/ipv6 section ;)
Matthias-Christian Ott wrote:
> Christian Schmid wrote:
>
>> Hi.
>>
>> Another bug hit me today HARD! I have been experiencing with lowering
>> the socket-buffer to see if the behaviour of a slowdown reappears at
>> the same position. Result: With a 128 KB send-buffer, the slowdown
>> appears at around 3000 sockets. With 64 KB, it didnt appear up to 4500
>> sockets where a small slow-down appeared but I think this was a
>> disk-issue. So its definetly something with TCP-memory.
>>
>> But now I hit another BUG: After I have managed to create 4500
>> sockets, 10 minutes later an interesting phenomenon appeared: It locks
>> for 5 seconds every 60 seconds. I first thought this was something in
>> my program but I can do what I want, I wasn't able to fix this. Even a
>> restart of my program didnt help. It even appears with 400
>> connections. Then I despairedly just restarted the system and: It was
>> gone. So what is THIS?
>>
>> Sorry if I am a bit angry. I know you are doing a really good job.
>> Maybe I can donate some money somewhere but PLEASE!!!!! help me fix
>> this bugs.... Thank you.
>>
>> Chris
>>
>>
> Hi!
> I'm not a Perl Coder or Socket Specialist, but did try an implementation
> of your program in C (maybe it's a perl "bug"?)? And as mentioned in the
> other Thread, try to use send () instead of sendfile (). Anyway it's
> strange. Try to contact some of the Maintainers and Developers of this
> part of the IP v4 implementation in Linux.
>
> Matthias-Christian Ott
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-21 20:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-21 20:04 ARGH MORE BUGS!!! Christian Schmid
2005-02-21 20:19 ` Matthias-Christian Ott
2005-02-21 20:25 ` Christian Schmid [this message]
2005-02-21 20:28 ` Francois Romieu
2005-02-21 20:34 ` Christian Schmid
2005-02-21 20:56 ` Francois Romieu
2005-02-21 21:17 ` Christian Schmid
2005-02-21 21:36 ` Francois Romieu
2005-02-21 22:10 ` Christian Schmid
2005-02-21 23:03 ` Christian Schmid
2005-02-22 0:23 ` argh more bugs!!! Francois Romieu
2005-02-22 0:37 ` Christian Schmid
2005-02-22 0:10 ` ARGH MORE BUGS!!! Christian Schmid
2005-02-21 21:18 ` Christian Schmid
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=421A43BE.6080604@rapidforum.com \
--to=webmaster@rapidforum.com \
--cc=matthias.christian@tiscali.de \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).