From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com>
Subject: Re: Intel and TOE in the news
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 13:20:04 -0800
Message-ID: <421BA204.704@hp.com>
References: <200502222052.j1MKqaDD022407@guinness.s2io.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: netdev@oss.sgi.com
In-Reply-To: <200502222052.j1MKqaDD022407@guinness.s2io.com>
Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com
Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

I always thought the biggest issue with "RSO" would be deciding how long to wait 
for another segment to paste-in with the rest?

rick jones

all the previous talk about header/data split makes me wax nostalgic for the 
FDDI adaptors of the late 80's and early 90's that did that - back when MTU's 
were >= page size and life was good :) :) :)