From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: Denis Vlasenko <vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Quantum Scientific <Info@quantum-sci.com>,
netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Kernel 2.6 IPV6 Busted
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2005 11:26:34 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <422497BA.9090606@pobox.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200503011207.34029.vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua>
Denis Vlasenko wrote:
> On Sunday 27 February 2005 23:35, David S. Miller wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 27 Feb 2005 14:10:39 -0600
>>Quantum Scientific <Info@quantum-sci.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I am skeptical about this assertion that the whole internet needs to be hashed
>>>if connection tracking.
>>
>>Connection tracking and NAT broke entirely the end-to-end host
>>assumption that used to be valid on the internet.
>>
>>There are many very important optimizations we've had to disable
>>by default just in TCP alone because of NAT.
>
>
> I don't think future Internet will be safe enough to open
> corporate networks. I definitely won't do it.
> NAT firewall in front of my net is an absolute requirement
> for me.
>
> However, IPv6 in Internet won't happen tomorrow,
> no rush...
You don't need NAT to secure a corporate network.
Just write sane firewall rules that don't allow incoming.
Jeff
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-01 16:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-27 15:28 Kernel 2.6 IPV6 Busted Quantum Scientific
2005-02-27 16:10 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2005-02-27 16:29 ` Quantum Scientific
2005-02-27 17:28 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2005-02-27 18:08 ` Quantum Scientific
2005-03-15 5:00 ` Horms
2005-02-27 17:40 ` Andre Tomt
2005-02-27 18:20 ` Quantum Scientific
2005-02-27 18:59 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-02-27 19:10 ` Quantum Scientific
2005-02-27 19:58 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-02-27 20:10 ` Quantum Scientific
2005-02-27 21:35 ` David S. Miller
2005-03-01 10:07 ` Denis Vlasenko
2005-03-01 13:50 ` Quantum Scientific
2005-03-01 16:26 ` Jeff Garzik [this message]
2005-03-01 20:46 ` Tomasz Torcz
2005-03-01 23:55 ` Quantum Scientific
2005-03-02 14:02 ` Denis Vlasenko
2005-03-02 19:12 ` Jeff Garzik
2005-03-01 21:50 ` Andre Tomt
2005-03-01 23:59 ` Quantum Scientific
2005-02-27 18:12 ` Jeff Garzik
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=422497BA.9090606@pobox.com \
--to=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=Info@quantum-sci.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).