netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Baruch Even <baruch@ev-en.org>
To: hadi@cyberus.ca
Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org>,
	Injong Rhee <rhee@eos.ncsu.edu>, John Heffner <jheffner@psc.edu>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Yee-Ting Li <Yee-Ting.Li@nuim.ie>,
	netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: netif_rx packet dumping
Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2005 22:31:28 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <42279040.5050003@ev-en.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1109887386.1092.333.camel@jzny.localdomain>

jamal wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-03-03 at 16:26, Baruch Even wrote:
> 
> 
>>NAPI was not used because it caused skews in the performance, I haven't 
>>tested it myself, just passing hearsay.
> 
> It will help to post on this list when such issues are noticed.
> It could be a simple a driver bug: such a the one posted on by Lennert 2
> days ago on e1000 NAPI - such a bug could have had serious repurcasions
> on TCP because it sat on packets in DMA occasionally upto 2 seconds.
> Seems like that bug has been sitting there for a long time.
> What kernel version? What kind of skews?
> Is it possible you tell this person to repeat the tests with 2.6.11?

I have asked around but there is no hard data to substantiate the claim 
at this time. And since then all tests were done non-NAPI style.

Kernel versions were probably 2.4.23 or some other 2.4 kernel.

Baruch

      reply	other threads:[~2005-03-03 22:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 51+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-03-03 20:38 netif_rx packet dumping Stephen Hemminger
2005-03-03 20:55 ` David S. Miller
2005-03-03 21:01   ` Stephen Hemminger
2005-03-03 21:18   ` jamal
2005-03-03 21:21     ` Stephen Hemminger
2005-03-03 21:24       ` jamal
2005-03-03 21:32         ` David S. Miller
2005-03-03 21:54           ` Stephen Hemminger
2005-03-03 22:02             ` John Heffner
2005-03-03 22:26               ` jamal
2005-03-03 23:16                 ` Stephen Hemminger
2005-03-03 23:40                   ` jamal
2005-03-03 23:48                   ` Baruch Even
2005-03-04  3:45                     ` jamal
2005-03-04  8:47                       ` Baruch Even
2005-03-07 13:55                         ` jamal
2005-03-08 15:56                           ` Baruch Even
2005-03-08 22:02                             ` jamal
2005-03-22 21:55                             ` cliff white
2005-03-03 23:48                   ` John Heffner
2005-03-04  1:42                     ` Lennert Buytenhek
2005-03-04  3:10                       ` John Heffner
2005-03-04  3:31                         ` Lennert Buytenhek
2005-03-04 19:52                 ` Edgar E Iglesias
2005-03-04 19:54                   ` Stephen Hemminger
2005-03-04 21:41                     ` Edgar E Iglesias
2005-03-04 19:49             ` Jason Lunz
2005-03-03 22:01           ` jamal
2005-03-03 21:26 ` Baruch Even
2005-03-03 21:36   ` David S. Miller
2005-03-03 21:44     ` Baruch Even
2005-03-03 21:54       ` Andi Kleen
2005-03-03 22:04         ` David S. Miller
2005-03-03 21:57       ` David S. Miller
2005-03-03 22:14         ` Baruch Even
2005-03-08 15:42         ` Baruch Even
2005-03-08 17:00           ` Andi Kleen
2005-03-08 18:01             ` Baruch Even
2005-03-08 18:09             ` David S. Miller
2005-03-08 18:18               ` Andi Kleen
2005-03-08 18:37                 ` Thomas Graf
2005-03-08 18:51                   ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2005-03-08 22:16                   ` Andi Kleen
2005-03-08 18:27               ` Ben Greear
2005-03-09 23:57                 ` Thomas Graf
2005-03-10  0:03                   ` Stephen Hemminger
2005-03-10  8:33                   ` Andi Kleen
2005-03-10 14:08                     ` Thomas Graf
2005-03-31 16:33         ` Baruch Even
2005-03-03 22:03   ` jamal
2005-03-03 22:31     ` Baruch Even [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=42279040.5050003@ev-en.org \
    --to=baruch@ev-en.org \
    --cc=Yee-Ting.Li@nuim.ie \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=hadi@cyberus.ca \
    --cc=jheffner@psc.edu \
    --cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
    --cc=rhee@eos.ncsu.edu \
    --cc=shemminger@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).