netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: hadi@cyberus.ca
Cc: Ben Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>,
	leo@yuriev.ru, Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@wantstofly.org>,
	shemminger@osdl.org, netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [leo@yuriev.ru: [PATCH] ethernet-bridge: update skb->priority in case forwarded frame has VLAN-header]
Date: Tue, 08 Mar 2005 00:53:39 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <422CE983.7060305@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1110238537.1043.62.camel@jzny.localdomain>

jamal wrote:
>>
>>The priority should still start at 0. You don't want to create a 16-band
>>queue just to have 8 bands unused.
> 
> 
> say what?;-> Nothing has to start at 0. 16 priorities does not equate to
> 16 queues. 

Right. But the default pfifo_fast/prio mapping maps the upper 8 values
to queue 1, which seems to make this effort kind of useless. I don't
know if the default-mapping of the lower 8 values is useable in this
context, I need to inform myself more on this subject (thanks for the
IEEE vs. IETF pointers).

Regards
Patrick

  reply	other threads:[~2005-03-07 23:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-03-05 14:12 [leo@yuriev.ru: [PATCH] ethernet-bridge: update skb->priority in case forwarded frame has VLAN-header] Lennert Buytenhek
2005-03-05 16:08 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-03-05 19:44   ` Ben Greear
2005-03-07 12:48     ` jamal
2005-03-07 19:36       ` Patrick McHardy
2005-03-07 23:35         ` jamal
2005-03-07 23:53           ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2005-03-08  0:19             ` jamal
2005-03-08  3:38               ` Patrick McHardy
2005-03-08 13:13                 ` jamal
2005-03-08 17:45                   ` Ben Greear
2005-03-08 21:43                     ` jamal
2005-03-10 13:26       ` Re[2]: " Leo Yuriev
2005-03-10 14:42         ` jamal
2005-03-07 18:07 ` Stephen Hemminger
2005-03-07 18:13   ` Ben Greear
2005-03-07 18:16   ` Patrick McHardy
2005-03-07 18:50     ` Stephen Hemminger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=422CE983.7060305@trash.net \
    --to=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=buytenh@wantstofly.org \
    --cc=greearb@candelatech.com \
    --cc=hadi@cyberus.ca \
    --cc=leo@yuriev.ru \
    --cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
    --cc=shemminger@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).