netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com, dtor_core@ameritech.net,
	netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Last night Linus bk - netfilter busted?
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 21:49:18 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4232044E.8030001@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050311105136.2a5e4ddc.davem@davemloft.net>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 561 bytes --]

David S. Miller wrote:
> Damn, wait, Patrick, I think I know what's happening.  The iptables
> IPT_* verdicts are dependant upon the NF_* values, and they don't
> cope with Bart's changes I bet.  Can you figure out what the exact
> error would be?  This kind of issue would explain the looping inside
> of ipt_do_table(), wouldn't it?

You're right, good catch. IPT_RETURN is interpreted internally by
ip_tables, but since the value changed it isn't recognized by ip_tables
anymore and returned to nf_iterate() as NF_REPEAT. This patch restores
the old value.


[-- Attachment #2: x --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1594 bytes --]

# This is a BitKeeper generated diff -Nru style patch.
#
# ChangeSet
#   2005/03/11 21:41:01+01:00 kaber@coreworks.de 
#   [NETFILTER]: Fix iptables userspace compatibility breakage
#   
#   Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
# 
# include/linux/netfilter_ipv6/ip6_tables.h
#   2005/03/11 21:40:52+01:00 kaber@coreworks.de +1 -1
#   [NETFILTER]: Fix iptables userspace compatibility breakage
#   
#   Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
# 
# include/linux/netfilter_ipv4/ip_tables.h
#   2005/03/11 21:40:52+01:00 kaber@coreworks.de +1 -1
#   [NETFILTER]: Fix iptables userspace compatibility breakage
#   
#   Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
# 
diff -Nru a/include/linux/netfilter_ipv4/ip_tables.h b/include/linux/netfilter_ipv4/ip_tables.h
--- a/include/linux/netfilter_ipv4/ip_tables.h	2005-03-11 21:41:32 +01:00
+++ b/include/linux/netfilter_ipv4/ip_tables.h	2005-03-11 21:41:32 +01:00
@@ -166,7 +166,7 @@
 #define IPT_CONTINUE 0xFFFFFFFF
 
 /* For standard target */
-#define IPT_RETURN (-NF_MAX_VERDICT - 1)
+#define IPT_RETURN (-NF_REPEAT - 1)
 
 /* TCP matching stuff */
 struct ipt_tcp
diff -Nru a/include/linux/netfilter_ipv6/ip6_tables.h b/include/linux/netfilter_ipv6/ip6_tables.h
--- a/include/linux/netfilter_ipv6/ip6_tables.h	2005-03-11 21:41:32 +01:00
+++ b/include/linux/netfilter_ipv6/ip6_tables.h	2005-03-11 21:41:32 +01:00
@@ -166,7 +166,7 @@
 #define IP6T_CONTINUE 0xFFFFFFFF
 
 /* For standard target */
-#define IP6T_RETURN (-NF_MAX_VERDICT - 1)
+#define IP6T_RETURN (-NF_REPEAT - 1)
 
 /* TCP matching stuff */
 struct ip6t_tcp

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-03-11 20:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-03-11  7:23 Last night Linus bk - netfilter busted? Dmitry Torokhov
2005-03-11 14:00 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-03-11 18:51   ` David S. Miller
2005-03-11 18:56     ` Dmitry Torokhov
2005-03-11 19:27     ` Sergey Vlasov
2005-03-11 20:49     ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2005-03-11 21:21       ` Herbert Xu
2005-03-11 22:55         ` Patrick McHardy
2005-03-13  6:54           ` Dmitry Torokhov

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4232044E.8030001@trash.net \
    --to=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dtor_core@ameritech.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).