From: Nivedita Singhvi <niv@us.ibm.com>
To: Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com>
Cc: linux-netdev <netdev@oss.sgi.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Optimize loopback stats
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 12:14:54 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4237423E.2040505@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200503151459_MC3-1-989A-61A4@compuserve.com>
Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> This patch optimizes the loopback driver's statistics by using a single
> counter for rx and tx stats instead of one for rx and one for tx. It also
> adds unlikely() to the test for TSO since it's no longer supported by default.
> (Maybe the TSO code should be bracketed by "#if 0" ?)
Hmm, some of us want those counters separate - if this is really
needed, could it be a configurable option, please?
thanks,
Nivedita
> o saves 84 bytes per CPU on 32bit and 168 bytes on 64 bit
> (should save 84K data on 512-way ia64)
>
> o AFAICT the driver is ~2.5% faster sending PF_PACKET data
>
> o applies on top of Christoph's patch in -mm that removes update
> of the device's last_rx field
>
> Signed-off-by: Chuck Ebbert <76306.1226@compuserve.com>
>
> --- 2.6.11-mm/drivers/net/loopback.c 2005-03-15 14:23:30.180677000 -0500
> +++ 2.6.11-ce/drivers/net/loopback.c 2005-03-15 14:26:23.700677000 -0500
> @@ -58,7 +58,12 @@
> #include <linux/tcp.h>
> #include <linux/percpu.h>
>
> -static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct net_device_stats, loopback_stats);
> +struct loopback_device_stats {
> + unsigned long rx_tx_bytes;
> + unsigned long rx_tx_packets;
> +};
> +
> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct loopback_device_stats, loopback_stats);
>
> #define LOOPBACK_OVERHEAD (128 + MAX_HEADER + 16 + 16)
>
> @@ -126,7 +131,7 @@ static void emulate_large_send_offload(s
> */
> static int loopback_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
> {
> - struct net_device_stats *lb_stats;
> + struct loopback_device_stats *lb_stats;
>
> skb_orphan(skb);
>
> @@ -136,7 +141,7 @@ static int loopback_xmit(struct sk_buff
> skb->ip_summed = CHECKSUM_UNNECESSARY;
> #endif
>
> - if (skb_shinfo(skb)->tso_size) {
> + if (unlikely(skb_shinfo(skb)->tso_size)) {
> BUG_ON(skb->protocol != htons(ETH_P_IP));
> BUG_ON(skb->nh.iph->protocol != IPPROTO_TCP);
>
> @@ -145,10 +150,8 @@ static int loopback_xmit(struct sk_buff
> }
>
> lb_stats = &per_cpu(loopback_stats, get_cpu());
> - lb_stats->rx_bytes += skb->len;
> - lb_stats->tx_bytes += skb->len;
> - lb_stats->rx_packets++;
> - lb_stats->tx_packets++;
> + lb_stats->rx_tx_bytes += skb->len;
> + lb_stats->rx_tx_packets++;
> put_cpu();
>
> netif_rx(skb);
> @@ -168,15 +171,15 @@ static struct net_device_stats *get_stat
> memset(stats, 0, sizeof(struct net_device_stats));
>
> for (i=0; i < NR_CPUS; i++) {
> - struct net_device_stats *lb_stats;
> + struct loopback_device_stats *lb_stats;
>
> if (!cpu_possible(i))
> continue;
> lb_stats = &per_cpu(loopback_stats, i);
> - stats->rx_bytes += lb_stats->rx_bytes;
> - stats->tx_bytes += lb_stats->tx_bytes;
> - stats->rx_packets += lb_stats->rx_packets;
> - stats->tx_packets += lb_stats->tx_packets;
> + stats->rx_bytes += lb_stats->rx_tx_bytes;
> + stats->tx_bytes = stats->rx_bytes;
> + stats->rx_packets += lb_stats->rx_tx_packets;
> + stats->tx_packets = stats->rx_packets;
> }
>
> return stats;
> _
>
> --
> Chuck
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-15 20:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-15 19:56 [PATCH] Optimize loopback stats Chuck Ebbert
2005-03-15 20:14 ` Nivedita Singhvi [this message]
2005-03-15 20:49 ` Nivedita Singhvi
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-03-15 23:15 Chuck Ebbert
2005-03-16 0:09 ` Nivedita Singhvi
2005-03-16 0:18 ` Nivedita Singhvi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4237423E.2040505@us.ibm.com \
--to=niv@us.ibm.com \
--cc=76306.1226@compuserve.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=clameter@sgi.com \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).