From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: Re: Problems with a PCI SMC2802W Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 13:14:21 -0500 Message-ID: <4238777D.6030209@pobox.com> References: <422F118D.8070704@voicenet.com> <20050309160744.GN4017@Redstar.dorchain.net> <20050309202718.4f94b871@veagle.suse.cz> <20050310021724.GD17854@ruslug.rutgers.edu> <42302133.2060103@voicenet.com> <20050310103608.GB1416@taniwha.stupidest.org> <20050310163007.GK17854@ruslug.rutgers.edu> <20050316162448.GR17854@ruslug.rutgers.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Netdev , Chris Wedgwood , prism54-devel@prism54.org, Feyd To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" In-Reply-To: <20050316162448.GR17854@ruslug.rutgers.edu> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: prism54-devel-bounces@prism54.org Errors-To: prism54-devel-bounces@prism54.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > Jeff/netdev, > > If no comment is given on how we should deal with > pci_dma_sync_single/pci_dma_sync_single_for_cpu for 2.4 I'm just going > to put in a nasty ifdef there. Comemnts? For 2.4, why not define pci_dma_sync_single_for_{device,cpu} as equivalent to pci_dma_sync_single? Jeff