netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
To: Netdev <netdev@oss.sgi.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Note on wireless development process
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2005 21:29:16 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4240D47C.8090707@pobox.com> (raw)


Just a general note...  like many other areas of the kernel, there is no 
wireless roadmap.  There is a set of technical criteria (see '2.6.x 
wireless update and status' post), but there is no One True Path to 
follow to get there.

People interested in working on wireless need to be their own guides, 
and find their own path.  There has been endless discussion on wireless, 
and not much movement.  So asking questions without attaching a patch 
won't get very far.  The general process is just like any other kernel 
development process:  post a patch, get feedback, revise patch, lather 
rinse repeat.

Don't wait for DaveM or me to suddenly post reams of wireless code.  I'm 
speculating about David's time, but I'm just too darned busy.  David and 
I play the roles of reviewer and advisor.  It's up to YOU to "scratch 
the itch" and get world-class wireless support into Linux.

With regards to development process, the main point of coordination is 
the wireless-2.6 queue itself, not a human.  Look at the wireless-2.6 
tree, consider what your next step is, and go there.  Don't bother 
thinking too much about code outside that tree (and upstream).

Please direct questions and comments to the netdev@oss.sgi.com mailing 
list, rather than privately emailing me or DaveM.  That way knowledge is 
shared, debated, and archived.

	Jeff

                 reply	other threads:[~2005-03-23  2:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4240D47C.8090707@pobox.com \
    --to=jgarzik@pobox.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).