From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [PATCH] s390: claw network device driver Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2005 17:44:33 -0500 Message-ID: <4249DA51.1070201@pobox.com> References: <200503290533.j2T5XEYT028850@hera.kernel.org> <4248FBFD.5000809@pobox.com> <20050328230830.5e90396f.akpm@osdl.org> <20050329071002.GA16204@havoc.gtf.org> <20050329152057.GA27840@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> <4249B52C.2000300@pobox.com> <20050329212543.GA432@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, schwidefsky@de.ibm.com, netdev@oss.sgi.com Return-path: To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn_Engel?= In-Reply-To: <20050329212543.GA432@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org J=F6rn Engel wrote: > On Tue, 29 March 2005 15:06:04 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote: >=20 >>J=F6rn Engel wrote: >> >>>Just out of curiosity: why are there two mailing lists? Especially if >>>one of them is the Wrong One. >> >> >> >>linux-net is mostly dead. I get the impression it is occasionally used= =20 >>by users. >> >>netdev (as, perhaps, the name implies) is where the network developers=20 >>hang out. >=20 >=20 > Ok, I figured as much. But then, why is linux-net not just deleted? > Bouncing mails would be an indication that noone will read them, > right? It doesn't matter that much to me. If you want to undertake=20 the removal of linux-net as your personal mission, I won't stop you :) Jeff