netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pablo Neira <pablo@eurodev.net>
To: hadi@znyx.com
Cc: netdev <netdev@oss.sgi.com>,
	netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
	Harald Welte <laforge@gnumonks.org>
Subject: Re: iptables versioning feature causes ABI breakage
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 02:13:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <424B40B7.50402@eurodev.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1111789452.1089.725.camel@jzny.localdomain>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1214 bytes --]

Jamal Hadi Salim wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 16:17, Pablo Neira wrote:
>>I was also involved in that change together with Rusty around january. 
>>It's a new infrastructure to extend matches/targets without breaking 
>>backward compatibility with previous releases of target/matches/iptables.
> 
> I think in the future this will go fine; all actions have a version
> field as well that is set to 0 at the moment.

Hm, it's not set to 0, it's set to the highest revision of the target 
found in the kernel.

tc qdisc add dev eth0 ingress
tc filter add dev eth0 parent ffff: protocol ip prio 6 u32 match ip src 
10.0.2.24/32 flowid 1:16 action ipt -j MARK --and-mark 0x1

That example works fine and those options are only available in the 
brand new revision of MARK.

>>Your patch for tc to fix the problem looks fine. BTW, you can now use 
>>extended MARK features like --and-mark and --or-mark ;->
>>
> 
> cool.
> 
> Would you like to pay for your sins;-> by looking at my code to see it
> doesnt break or miss things?

I've found some problems, attached a patch to fix some things:

- a leak in option handling
- it doesn't check that the target received the correct parameters 
(m->final_check).

--
Pablo

[-- Attachment #2: x --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 2801 bytes --]

===== tc/m_ipt.c 1.5 vs edited =====
--- 1.5/tc/m_ipt.c	2005-03-24 12:53:31 +01:00
+++ edited/tc/m_ipt.c	2005-03-31 02:05:42 +02:00
@@ -69,6 +69,7 @@
 };
 
 static struct iptables_target *t_list = NULL;
+static struct option *opts = original_opts;
 static unsigned int global_option_offset = 0;
 #define OPTION_OFFSET 256
 
@@ -169,18 +170,13 @@
 	return result;
 }
 
-static struct option *
-copy_options(struct option *oldopts)
+static void free_opts(struct option *opts)
 {
-	struct option *merge;
-	unsigned int num_old;
-	for (num_old = 0; oldopts[num_old].name; num_old++) ;
-	merge = malloc(sizeof (struct option) * (num_old + 1));
-	if (NULL == merge)
-		return NULL;
-	memcpy(merge, oldopts, num_old * sizeof (struct option));
-	memset(merge + num_old, 0, sizeof (struct option));
-	return merge;
+	if (opts != original_opts) {
+		free(opts);
+		opts = original_opts;
+		global_option_offset = 0;
+	}
 }
 
 static struct option *
@@ -385,7 +381,6 @@
 	int c;
 	int rargc = *argc_p;
 	char **argv = *argv_p;
-	struct option *opts;
 	int argc = 0, iargc = 0;
 	char k[16];
 	int res = -1;
@@ -409,11 +404,6 @@
 		return -1;
 	}
 
-	opts = copy_options(original_opts);
-
-	if (NULL == opts)
-		return -1;
-
 	while (1) {
 		c = getopt_long(argc, argv, "j:", opts, NULL);
 		if (c == -1)
@@ -440,23 +430,14 @@
 		default:
 			memset(&fw, 0, sizeof (fw));
 			if (m) {
-				unsigned int fake_flags = 0;
 				m->parse(c - m->option_offset, argv, 0,
-					 &fake_flags, NULL, &m->t);
+					 &m->tflags, NULL, &m->t);
 			} else {
 				fprintf(stderr," failed to find target %s\n\n", optarg);
 				return -1;
 
 			}
 			ok++;
-
-			/*m->final_check(m->t); -- Is this necessary?
-			** useful when theres depencies
-			** eg ipt_TCPMSS.c has have the TCP match loaded
-			** before this can be used;
-			**  also seems the ECN target needs it 
-			*/
-
 			break;
 
 		}
@@ -466,6 +447,7 @@
 		if (matches(argv[optind], "index") == 0) {
 			if (get_u32(&index, argv[optind + 1], 10)) {
 				fprintf(stderr, "Illegal \"index\"\n");
+				free_opts(opts);
 				return -1;
 			}
 			iok++;
@@ -479,6 +461,10 @@
 		return -1;
 	}
 
+	/* check that we passed the correct parameters to the target */
+	if (m)
+		m->final_check(m->tflags);
+
 	{
 		struct tcmsg *t = NLMSG_DATA(n);
 		if (t->tcm_parent != TC_H_ROOT
@@ -519,6 +505,7 @@
 	*argv_p = argv;
 	
 	optind = 1;
+	free_opts(opts);
 
 	return 0;
 
@@ -529,16 +516,10 @@
 {
 	struct rtattr *tb[TCA_IPT_MAX + 1];
 	struct ipt_entry_target *t = NULL;
-	struct option *opts;
 
 	if (arg == NULL)
 		return -1;
 
-	opts = copy_options(original_opts);
-
-	if (NULL == opts)
-		return -1;
-
 	parse_rtattr_nested(tb, TCA_IPT_MAX, arg);
 
 	if (tb[TCA_IPT_TABLE] == NULL) {
@@ -601,6 +582,7 @@
 		fprintf(f, " \n");
 
 	}
+	free_opts(opts);
 
 	return 0;
 }

      reply	other threads:[~2005-03-31  0:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-03-24 12:11 iptables versioning feature causes ABI breakage Jamal Hadi Salim
2005-03-24 12:33 ` Harald Welte
2005-03-24 12:46   ` jamal
2005-03-24 21:17 ` Pablo Neira
2005-03-25 22:24   ` Jamal Hadi Salim
2005-03-31  0:13     ` Pablo Neira [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=424B40B7.50402@eurodev.net \
    --to=pablo@eurodev.net \
    --cc=hadi@znyx.com \
    --cc=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=laforge@gnumonks.org \
    --cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).