From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Aidas Kasparas Subject: Re: [Ipsec-tools-devel] Re: IPSEC: on behavior of acquire Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 15:59:27 +0300 Message-ID: <42513A2F.7020504@gmc.lt> References: <1112405303.1096.37.camel@jzny.localdomain> <424E454D.4090402@gmc.lt> <1112477326.1088.321.camel@jzny.localdomain> <424FA946.70809@gmc.lt> <1112538566.1096.391.camel@jzny.localdomain> <425067D9.9050603@gmc.lt> <1112618007.1096.465.camel@jzny.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: ipsec-tools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, netdev , nakam@linux-ipv6.org Return-path: To: hadi@cyberus.ca In-Reply-To: <1112618007.1096.465.camel@jzny.localdomain> Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org jamal wrote: > I think i have made a bad case of explaining. > Yes, I know where acquires terminate. However this is not about where > acquires terminate. It is insufficient to assume that a succesful > acquire to user space equates to successful interaction to the KE server > which will do an update. Why? -- Aidas Kasparas IT administrator GM Consult Group, UAB