From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com, netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org,
Yair@arx.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Re-routing packets via netfilter (ip_rt_bug)
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 17:28:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <426D0CB9.4060500@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <E1DQ1Ct-00055s-00@gondolin.me.apana.org.au>
Herbert Xu wrote:
> You'll still BUG if the destination is multicast/broadcast. I'm also
> unsure whether ipt_REJECT isn't susceptible to the same problem.
> Luckily ipt_MIRROR is no more :)
ipt_REJECT is fine, ip_route_input() is only used in NF_IP_FORWARD.
But you're right about multicast/broadcast still causing problems,
I'll have another look.
> What are the issues with getting rid of the ip_route_input path
> altogether?
>
> The only thing we gain over calling ip_route_output is the ability
> to set the input device. But even that is just a fake derived from
> the source address in a deterministic way. Therefore any effects
> achievable through using ip_route_input can also be done by simply
> reconfiguring the policy routing table to look at the local source
> addresses instead of (or in conjunction with) the input device.
No, ip_route_me_harder() can be called for packets with non-local
source. ip_route_output_slow() rejects non-local source addresses,
so the only way to use them for policy routing is by using
ip_route_input().
Regards
Patrick
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-04-25 15:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <426CB342.2010504@trash.net>
2005-04-25 10:52 ` Re-routing packets via netfilter (ip_rt_bug) Herbert Xu
2005-04-25 15:28 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2005-04-25 21:34 ` Herbert Xu
2005-04-26 0:08 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-04-26 0:39 ` Herbert Xu
2005-04-26 13:17 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-04-26 23:28 ` Herbert Xu
2005-04-27 0:56 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-04-27 1:07 ` Herbert Xu
2005-04-27 10:26 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-04-27 10:30 ` Herbert Xu
2005-04-27 10:41 ` Jozsef Kadlecsik
2005-04-27 11:35 ` Herbert Xu
2005-04-27 11:54 ` Herbert Xu
2005-04-27 12:05 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-04-26 15:39 Yair Itzhaki
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-05-02 17:17 Yair Itzhaki
2005-07-14 12:27 ` Ric Wheeler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=426D0CB9.4060500@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=Yair@arx.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).