From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: patch: Action repeat Date: Wed, 04 May 2005 14:15:24 +0200 Message-ID: <4278BCDC.8010208@trash.net> References: <4273BBAA.6060405@trash.net> <1114882045.8929.123.camel@localhost.localdomain> <4273CAB7.6080403@trash.net> <1114890709.8929.147.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050430200848.GF577@postel.suug.ch> <1114894202.8929.165.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050430215550.GH577@postel.suug.ch> <1114900485.8929.171.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050430235809.GI577@postel.suug.ch> <1115035838.8929.236.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050502150632.GM577@postel.suug.ch> <1115207194.7665.109.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Thomas Graf , netdev , "David S. Miller" Return-path: To: hadi@cyberus.ca In-Reply-To: <1115207194.7665.109.camel@localhost.localdomain> Sender: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com Errors-to: netdev-bounce@oss.sgi.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org jamal wrote: > Patrick, either you or i could do it. It doesnt matter if at the moment > the structure only contains tcf_result or elements of tcf_result because > i will add more to it later. Then we could kill access to tc_classid in > exec() I'll do it, I have a few patches touching this code lying around anyway Regards Patrick