From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: CONFIG_NETFILTER_DEBUG spew Date: Fri, 06 May 2005 00:36:35 +0200 Message-ID: <427A9FF3.7060408@trash.net> References: <20050501032809.3d0b4cda.akpm@osdl.org> <20050501111507.GA2133@gondor.apana.org.au> <4274F2ED.9080404@trash.net> <20050505111457.GS30482@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com, netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org, Herbert Xu Return-path: To: Harald Welte In-Reply-To: <20050505111457.GS30482@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org Errors-To: netfilter-devel-bounces@lists.netfilter.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Harald Welte wrote: > On Sun, May 01, 2005 at 05:17:01PM +0200, Patrick McHardy wrote: > >>You're right. I'm tempted to remove the entire nf_debug stuff, >>as far as I know it has never found a real bug. But for now >>I've only fixed the warning. > > > yes, I second that change. At the same time, we should get rid of all > the lockhelp.h stuff that makes the netfilter code use non-standard lock > primitives. I've removed nf_debug. As for lockhelp.h, I'm still undecided whether I should try to make rwlock debugging a feature of standard rwlocks or else what to do with all the rwlock assertions. Regards Patrick