netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nivedita Singhvi <niv@us.ibm.com>
To: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com>
Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] "strict" ipv4 reassembly
Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 12:25:31 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <428A452B.2010008@us.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <428A425F.7000807@hp.com>

Rick Jones wrote:

> 
>> This is a fast LAN problem - real internet latencies
>> don't allow for the wrapping of the id field that fast.
> 
> 
> What is a "fast" LAN these days?  We were seeing IP ID wrap with NFS 
> traffic back in the time of HP-UX 8.07 (early 1990's) over 10 Mbit/s 
> Ethernet.  Since I'm waxing historic, part of the problem at that time 
> was giving the IP fragments to the driver one at a time rather than all 
> at once.  When the system was as fast or faster than the network, and 
> the driver queue filled, the first couple fragments of a datagram would 
> get into the queue, and the rest would be dropped, setting the stage for 
> those wonderful Frankengrams.  Part of the fix was to require a driver 
> to take an entire IP datagram's worth of fragments or none of them.

Yes, a different manifestation of the problem ;). I was talking
in the context of current Linux code and the common ethernet drivers
and typical current Internet/Intranet latencies.

> And there was at least one CKO NIC from that era (the HP-PB FDDI NIC) 
> where the first IP datagram fragment was sent last :)
> 
> If the WAN connected system is (still?) using a global IP ID rather than 
> per-route, it could quite easily be wrapping.  And we have WAN links 
> with bandwidths of 10's of Megabits, so it also comes-down to how much 
> other traffic is going and the quantity of request parallelism in NFS 
> right?

Actually, the problem is much worse now - we have virtual
partitions in the Xen environment for instance where some
packets are headed for local consumption (virtual network,
no actual network latency to speak of) and some going
out to the network. Having a global IP id generator just
won't be able to keep up - we could wrap in submilliseconds...

> The larger NFS UDP mount sizes mean more fragments, but intriguingly, 
> they also mean slower wrap of the IP ID space :)

True, but in a 32 NIC environment, see how they wrap ;)...

thanks,
Nivedita

  reply	other threads:[~2005-05-17 19:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-05-17 16:18 [RFC/PATCH] "strict" ipv4 reassembly Arthur Kepner
2005-05-17 17:49 ` David S. Miller
2005-05-17 18:28   ` Arthur Kepner
2005-05-17 18:48     ` David S. Miller
2005-05-17 20:21       ` Arthur Kepner
2005-05-17 18:38   ` Andi Kleen
2005-05-17 18:45     ` Pekka Savola
2005-05-17 18:50     ` David S. Miller
2005-05-17 18:56       ` Rick Jones
2005-05-17 18:57     ` John Heffner
2005-05-17 19:09       ` David S. Miller
2005-05-17 19:21         ` Rick Jones
2005-05-17 19:26         ` Ben Greear
2005-05-17 20:48         ` Thomas Graf
2005-05-17 19:17       ` Andi Kleen
2005-05-17 19:56         ` David Stevens
2005-05-17 20:17           ` Andi Kleen
2005-05-17 20:22             ` David S. Miller
2005-05-17 20:27               ` Andi Kleen
2005-05-17 21:02                 ` David S. Miller
2005-05-17 21:13                   ` Andi Kleen
2005-05-17 21:24                     ` David S. Miller
2005-05-17 21:25                   ` Rick Jones
2005-05-17 22:06                     ` Arthur Kepner
2005-05-17 22:18                       ` Rick Jones
2005-05-17 22:40                         ` David Stevens
2005-05-17 23:11                           ` Herbert Xu
2005-05-17 23:20                             ` Arthur Kepner
2005-05-17 23:25                               ` Herbert Xu
2005-05-17 23:55                                 ` David Stevens
2005-05-18  0:00                                   ` Herbert Xu
2005-05-18  0:04                                 ` Andi Kleen
2005-05-18  0:09                                   ` Herbert Xu
2005-05-18  0:52                                     ` David S. Miller
2005-05-18  0:06                                 ` Nivedita Singhvi
2005-05-18  0:10                                   ` Herbert Xu
2005-05-18  0:51                                     ` David S. Miller
2005-05-18  1:05                                       ` Andi Kleen
2005-05-18  1:13                                       ` Herbert Xu
2005-05-18  1:09                                 ` John Heffner
2005-05-17 23:53                           ` Rick Jones
2005-05-17 22:12                     ` David S. Miller
2005-05-17 22:23                       ` Rick Jones
2005-05-17 20:29           ` John Heffner
2005-05-17 19:01     ` Nivedita Singhvi
2005-05-17 19:13       ` Rick Jones
2005-05-17 19:25         ` Nivedita Singhvi [this message]
2005-05-17 19:31           ` John Heffner
2005-05-17 19:52             ` Nivedita Singhvi
2005-05-17 20:05               ` John Heffner
2005-05-17 20:12                 ` Rick Jones
2005-05-17 19:33           ` Rick Jones
2005-05-17 19:53             ` Andi Kleen
2005-05-17 22:11   ` Herbert Xu
2005-05-17 22:13     ` David S. Miller
2005-05-17 23:08       ` Herbert Xu
2005-05-17 23:16         ` David S. Miller
2005-05-17 23:28           ` Herbert Xu
2005-05-17 23:36             ` Patrick McHardy
2005-05-17 23:41               ` Herbert Xu
2005-05-18  0:47     ` Thomas Graf
2005-05-18  1:06       ` Arthur Kepner
2005-05-18  1:16       ` Herbert Xu
2005-05-18  1:37         ` Thomas Graf
2005-05-18  1:52           ` Herbert Xu
2005-05-18 11:30             ` Thomas Graf
2005-05-18 11:40               ` Herbert Xu
2005-05-18 12:24                 ` Thomas Graf
2005-05-18 16:21           ` Rick Jones
2005-05-18 17:40             ` Thomas Graf
2005-05-18 17:44               ` Thomas Graf
2005-05-18 21:46                 ` Herbert Xu
2005-05-18 22:24                   ` David Stevens
2005-05-18 22:39                     ` Nivedita Singhvi
2005-05-18 23:31                     ` Thomas Graf
2005-05-18 21:45             ` Herbert Xu
2005-05-19 12:23               ` Thomas Graf
2005-05-19 12:48                 ` Herbert Xu
2005-05-19 15:19                   ` Thomas Graf
2005-05-19 17:02                 ` Rick Jones

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=428A452B.2010008@us.ibm.com \
    --to=niv@us.ibm.com \
    --cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
    --cc=rick.jones2@hp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).