netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@hp.com>
To: netdev@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [RFC/PATCH] "strict" ipv4 reassembly
Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 13:12:18 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <428A5022.2080606@hp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200505171605.21093.jheffner@psc.edu>


> Timer expiration is not dependent on latency, nor is IP ID wrap time.

IP ID wrap time depends on the rate at which IP datgrams are generated.  That 
will depend on latency if the stuff sitting above IP is latency sensitive and/or 
has not increased its "window" (classic TCP, or number of outstanding NFS 
requests ets) to compensate for latency.

So, it is certainly true that one cannot ass-u-me that a high latency path 
cannot have IP ID wrap, but latency can indeed be a factor in how quickly IP IDs 
will wrap in a given situation.

rick jones

  reply	other threads:[~2005-05-17 20:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 80+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-05-17 16:18 [RFC/PATCH] "strict" ipv4 reassembly Arthur Kepner
2005-05-17 17:49 ` David S. Miller
2005-05-17 18:28   ` Arthur Kepner
2005-05-17 18:48     ` David S. Miller
2005-05-17 20:21       ` Arthur Kepner
2005-05-17 18:38   ` Andi Kleen
2005-05-17 18:45     ` Pekka Savola
2005-05-17 18:50     ` David S. Miller
2005-05-17 18:56       ` Rick Jones
2005-05-17 18:57     ` John Heffner
2005-05-17 19:09       ` David S. Miller
2005-05-17 19:21         ` Rick Jones
2005-05-17 19:26         ` Ben Greear
2005-05-17 20:48         ` Thomas Graf
2005-05-17 19:17       ` Andi Kleen
2005-05-17 19:56         ` David Stevens
2005-05-17 20:17           ` Andi Kleen
2005-05-17 20:22             ` David S. Miller
2005-05-17 20:27               ` Andi Kleen
2005-05-17 21:02                 ` David S. Miller
2005-05-17 21:13                   ` Andi Kleen
2005-05-17 21:24                     ` David S. Miller
2005-05-17 21:25                   ` Rick Jones
2005-05-17 22:06                     ` Arthur Kepner
2005-05-17 22:18                       ` Rick Jones
2005-05-17 22:40                         ` David Stevens
2005-05-17 23:11                           ` Herbert Xu
2005-05-17 23:20                             ` Arthur Kepner
2005-05-17 23:25                               ` Herbert Xu
2005-05-17 23:55                                 ` David Stevens
2005-05-18  0:00                                   ` Herbert Xu
2005-05-18  0:04                                 ` Andi Kleen
2005-05-18  0:09                                   ` Herbert Xu
2005-05-18  0:52                                     ` David S. Miller
2005-05-18  0:06                                 ` Nivedita Singhvi
2005-05-18  0:10                                   ` Herbert Xu
2005-05-18  0:51                                     ` David S. Miller
2005-05-18  1:05                                       ` Andi Kleen
2005-05-18  1:13                                       ` Herbert Xu
2005-05-18  1:09                                 ` John Heffner
2005-05-17 23:53                           ` Rick Jones
2005-05-17 22:12                     ` David S. Miller
2005-05-17 22:23                       ` Rick Jones
2005-05-17 20:29           ` John Heffner
2005-05-17 19:01     ` Nivedita Singhvi
2005-05-17 19:13       ` Rick Jones
2005-05-17 19:25         ` Nivedita Singhvi
2005-05-17 19:31           ` John Heffner
2005-05-17 19:52             ` Nivedita Singhvi
2005-05-17 20:05               ` John Heffner
2005-05-17 20:12                 ` Rick Jones [this message]
2005-05-17 19:33           ` Rick Jones
2005-05-17 19:53             ` Andi Kleen
2005-05-17 22:11   ` Herbert Xu
2005-05-17 22:13     ` David S. Miller
2005-05-17 23:08       ` Herbert Xu
2005-05-17 23:16         ` David S. Miller
2005-05-17 23:28           ` Herbert Xu
2005-05-17 23:36             ` Patrick McHardy
2005-05-17 23:41               ` Herbert Xu
2005-05-18  0:47     ` Thomas Graf
2005-05-18  1:06       ` Arthur Kepner
2005-05-18  1:16       ` Herbert Xu
2005-05-18  1:37         ` Thomas Graf
2005-05-18  1:52           ` Herbert Xu
2005-05-18 11:30             ` Thomas Graf
2005-05-18 11:40               ` Herbert Xu
2005-05-18 12:24                 ` Thomas Graf
2005-05-18 16:21           ` Rick Jones
2005-05-18 17:40             ` Thomas Graf
2005-05-18 17:44               ` Thomas Graf
2005-05-18 21:46                 ` Herbert Xu
2005-05-18 22:24                   ` David Stevens
2005-05-18 22:39                     ` Nivedita Singhvi
2005-05-18 23:31                     ` Thomas Graf
2005-05-18 21:45             ` Herbert Xu
2005-05-19 12:23               ` Thomas Graf
2005-05-19 12:48                 ` Herbert Xu
2005-05-19 15:19                   ` Thomas Graf
2005-05-19 17:02                 ` Rick Jones

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=428A5022.2080606@hp.com \
    --to=rick.jones2@hp.com \
    --cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).