netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@osdl.org>
Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com, Jamal Hadi Salim <hadi@znyx.com>,
	lartc <lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl>
Subject: Re: Qdisc requeue should be void?
Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 22:47:48 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <428A5874.8020806@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050513105754.2e7cc243@dxpl.pdx.osdl.net>

Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> There is an design problem with the qdisc interface that causes qlen related bugs
> in netem, tbf, and other qdisc's that peek at the top of the queue. The problem is
> that requeue needs to be called from the dequeue function but requeue can fail.
> If requeue fails, then the calling qdisc can not properly handle the error.  If it
> returns NULL, then the parent's expectation about qlen gets messed up.
> 
> Example:
> 
> 	prio (qlen = 1)
> 		skb = netem dequeue 
> 			skb = htb dequeue 
> 			... decides not to send this skb now
> 			htp requeue(skb) fails
> 				?? what now 
> 				--netem.qlen // := 0
> 				return NULL
> 		 skb is NULL
> 
> at this point prio qlen is 1 but underlying queue's are empty.
> 
> My proposal is to require requeue to always succeed and change it to be
> void instead of returning int.

Perhaps we should add a ->peek() operation which guarantees that the
next dequeued packet is the one peeked at. This would also help with
a second problem resulting from requeueing in at least TBF and HFSC.
TBF looks at a packet and if it can't be sent immediately calculates
the delay from the packet's length. HFSC does the same to calculate
the deadline for a class. Both assume the next packet dequeued from
the underlying qdisc is the one requeued, which is only true with
non-reordering qdiscs. Adding a peek-operation increases the worst-case
delay by one maximum sized packet transmission time, but otherwise
these qdiscs can't make proper use of reordering qdiscs like SFQ
at all.

Regards
Patrick

      reply	other threads:[~2005-05-17 20:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-05-13 17:57 Qdisc requeue should be void? Stephen Hemminger
2005-05-17 20:47 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=428A5874.8020806@trash.net \
    --to=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=hadi@znyx.com \
    --cc=lartc@mailman.ds9a.nl \
    --cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
    --cc=shemminger@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).