From: Baruch Even <baruch@ev-en.org>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: netdev@oss.sgi.com, shemminger@osdl.org, doug.leith@nuim.ie
Subject: Re: Comparison of several congestion control algorithms
Date: Fri, 03 Jun 2005 00:50:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <429F9B2F.8030507@ev-en.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050602.163512.10298458.davem@davemloft.net>
David S. Miller wrote:
> From: Baruch Even <baruch@ev-en.org>
> Date: Sat, 28 May 2005 22:19:01 +0100
>
>
>>I wanted to point you to a comparison of congestion control algorithm
>>done at the Hamilton Institute. These experiments compare Scalable-TCP,
>>High-Speed TCP, FAST-TCP, BIC-TCP, H-TCP and Standard TCP. They compared
>> fairness, compatibility with TCP and link utilisation.
>>
>>You can find the results and a report at http://hamilton.ie/net/eval/
>
>
> Nice work, I enjoyed this paper very much.
>
> There is something that none of these papers mention, but is essential
> for interpreting results. Did you use interfaces with TSO enabled?
I did not do these experiments myself, but to the best of my knowledge,
none of the experiments done so far in Hamilton have used the TSO feature.
This is in part because of the start of the work that was based on 2.4
kernels and even as far as the 2.6.6 kernel which had disabled TSO once
it saw SACKs. This made TSO unusable for our needs.
AFAIK, the tests reported in that document used kernel 2.6.6.
Baruch
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-06-02 23:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-05-28 21:19 Comparison of several congestion control algorithms Baruch Even
2005-06-02 23:35 ` David S. Miller
2005-06-02 23:50 ` Baruch Even [this message]
2005-06-02 23:53 ` David S. Miller
2005-06-03 13:42 ` Baruch Even
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=429F9B2F.8030507@ev-en.org \
--to=baruch@ev-en.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=doug.leith@nuim.ie \
--cc=netdev@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=shemminger@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).