From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: [git patch] urgent e1000 fix Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 19:10:42 -0400 Message-ID: <42BB4172.5000904@pobox.com> References: <42BA7FB5.5020804@pobox.com> <42BB2749.1020209@pobox.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: David Lang , Andrew Morton , Linux Kernel , Netdev List Return-path: To: Linus Torvalds In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Linus Torvalds wrote: > > On Thu, 23 Jun 2005, Jeff Garzik wrote: > >>It's probably the whitespace thing that Linus's git-apply gadget was >>complaining about. >> >>I'm terribly surprising, though, since my patch(1) applied the diff just >>fine. > > > I could easily make git-apply accept empty lines as if they had a single > space on it. What I find surprising is that "patch" allows that kind of > whitespace corruption by default, and silently. Usually you have to give > it the "-l" flag to make it ignore whitespace differences.. patch(1) is a huge collection of heuristics like this, even without '-l', so I'm not surprised that it worked. Does git-apply support patches with "fuzz", out of curiosity? Jeff