From: Guillaume Pelat <guillaume.pelat@winch-hebergement.net>
To: davem@davemloft.net
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.13-rc4 - kernel panic - BUG at net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:918
Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2005 10:33:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42EDDE50.6050800@winch-hebergement.net> (raw)
Hi,
> [TCP]: Fix two TSO sizing bugs
>
> MSS changes can be lost since we preemptively initialize
> the tso_segs count for an SKB before we %100 commit
> to sending it out.
> So, by the time we send it out, the tso_size information
> can be stale due to PMTU events. This mucks up all of the
> logic in our send engine, and can even result in the BUG()
> triggering in tcp_tso_should_defer().
> Another problem we have is that we're storing the tp->mss_cache,
> not the SACK block normalized MSS, as the tso_size. That's wrong
> too.
>
> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
I just tried the patch attached. :)
The bug is still here (same symptoms), with a slightly different backtrace :
------------[ cut here ]------------
kernel BUG at net/ipv4/tcp_output.c:918!
invalid operand: 0000 [#1]
CPU: 0
EIP: 0060:[<c027dd66>] Not tainted VLI
EFLAGS: 00010297 (2.6.13-rc4-endy)
EIP is at tcp_tso_should_defer+0xd6/0xf0
eax: 00000005 ebx: f5032e80 ecx: 00000007 edx: f3b2fc00
esi: 00000006 edi: 00000006 ebp: c031fd78 esp: c031fd68
ds: 007b es: 007b ss: 0068
Process swapper (pid: 0, threadinfo=c031e000 task=c02dbb80)
Stack: f129b2b8 f5032e80 00000006 f3b2fc00 c031fdb0 c027de7b f3b2fc00
f3b2fc00
f5032e80 0000000b f3b2fc00 b7773884 00000000 00000005 00000002
f3b2fc00
f3b2fc00 f5a26034 c031fdd4 c027e1b2 f3b2fc00 00000564 00000001
f5a26034
Call Trace:
[<c0102e5f>] show_stack+0x7f/0xa0
[<c0103002>] show_registers+0x152/0x1c0
[<c01031f8>] die+0xc8/0x140
[<c0103325>] do_trap+0xb5/0xc0
[<c010366c>] do_invalid_op+0xbc/0xd0
[<c0102aa3>] error_code+0x4f/0x54
[<c027de7b>] tcp_write_xmit+0xfb/0x400
[<c027e1b2>] __tcp_push_pending_frames+0x32/0xd0
[<c027b1cc>] tcp_rcv_established+0x27c/0x860 (was
tcp_rcv_state_process before).
[<c0283f8a>] tcp_v4_do_rcv+0x11a/0x120
[<c0284502>] tcp_v4_rcv+0x572/0x750
[<c026a62b>] ip_local_deliver+0xcb/0x1d0
[<c026aa52>] ip_rcv+0x322/0x4a0
[<c0256a97>] netif_receive_skb+0x137/0x1a0
[<c0256b8f>] process_backlog+0x8f/0x110
[<c0256c82>] net_rx_action+0x72/0x100
[<c01172dc>] __do_softirq+0x8c/0xa0
[<c011731a>] do_softirq+0x2a/0x30
[<c01173d5>] irq_exit+0x35/0x40
[<c01044fc>] do_IRQ+0x3c/0x70
[<c0102a46>] common_interrupt+0x1a/0x20
[<c0100997>] cpu_idle+0x57/0x60
[<c010024b>] _stext+0x2b/0x30
[<c0320847>] start_kernel+0x147/0x170
[<c0100199>] 0xc0100199
Code: 89 f8 0f af c2 3b 45 f0 0f 47 45 f0 31 d2 89 45 f0 f7 f3 31 d2 39
c1 73 ce ba 01 00 00 00 eb c7 6b c2 03 31 d239 c1 77 be eb ee <0f> 0b 96
03 ce 54 2d c0 e9 76 ff ff ff 8b ba 78 02 00 00 eb eb
<0>Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt
I guess it's the same bug :)
Just a few more infos about the problem :
- Turning off TSO with ethtool solves the problem.
- I tried 2.6.13-rc4 on another server (with the same configuration) and
the bug occured too (so i guess it's not due to some weird memory
problem :) )
- The problem dont seems to be present in 2.6.12.3 (but i only tried
2.6.12.3 during 2 days).
Best Regards,
Guillaume Pelat
reply other threads:[~2005-08-01 8:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42EDDE50.6050800@winch-hebergement.net \
--to=guillaume.pelat@winch-hebergement.net \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox