From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Garzik Subject: Re: argh... ;/ Date: Fri, 05 Aug 2005 13:45:19 -0400 Message-ID: <42F3A5AF.8040908@pobox.com> References: <42F2D749.70306@gmail.com> <200508060241.30507.phillips@istop.com> <20050805172055.GB5641@tuxdriver.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: kernel-mentors@selenic.com, netdev , Daniel Phillips Return-path: To: "John W. Linville" In-Reply-To: <20050805172055.GB5641@tuxdriver.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: kernel-mentors-bounces@selenic.com Errors-To: kernel-mentors-bounces@selenic.com List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org John W. Linville wrote: > On Sat, Aug 06, 2005 at 02:41:30AM +1000, Daniel Phillips wrote: > >>On Friday 05 August 2005 13:04, Mateusz Berezecki wrote: >> >>>I accidentaly posted the patches as MIME attachments... its 5:03 am here > > >>Does anybody still care if patches are posted as attachments, particularly for >>review as opposed to submission? > > > Yes. Opening attachments makes them harder to review. Strongly agreed. Jeff