From: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>, alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf 1/2] bpf, sockmap: fix potential use after free in bpf_tcp_close
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2018 17:25:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <42a094b6-baaa-6d03-8e25-9ec7e15cee30@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180824200851.12308-2-daniel@iogearbox.net>
On 08/24/2018 01:08 PM, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> bpf_tcp_close() we pop the psock linkage to a map via psock_map_pop().
> A parallel update on the sock hash map can happen between psock_map_pop()
> and lookup_elem_raw() where we override the element under link->hash /
> link->key. In bpf_tcp_close()'s lookup_elem_raw() we subsequently only
> test whether an element is present, but we do not test whether the
> element is infact the element we were looking for.
>
> We lock the sock in bpf_tcp_close() during that time, so do we hold
> the lock in sock_hash_update_elem(). However, the latter locks the
> sock which is newly updated, not the one we're purging from the hash
> table. This means that while one CPU is doing the lookup from bpf_tcp_close(),
> another CPU is doing the map update in parallel, dropped our sock from
> the hlist and released the psock.
>
> Subsequently the first CPU will find the new sock and attempts to drop
> and release the old sock yet another time. Fix is that we need to check
> the elements for a match after lookup, similar as we do in the sock map.
> Note that the hash tab elems are freed via RCU, so access to their
> link->hash / link->key is fine since we're under RCU read side there.
>
> Fixes: e9db4ef6bf4c ("bpf: sockhash fix omitted bucket lock in sock_close")
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
> ---
Looks good to me, nice catch by the way.
Acked-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-08-25 4:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-08-24 20:08 [PATCH bpf 0/2] Two BPF sockmap fixes Daniel Borkmann
2018-08-24 20:08 ` [PATCH bpf 1/2] bpf, sockmap: fix potential use after free in bpf_tcp_close Daniel Borkmann
2018-08-25 0:25 ` John Fastabend [this message]
2018-08-24 20:08 ` [PATCH bpf 2/2] bpf, sockmap: fix psock refcount leak in bpf_tcp_recvmsg Daniel Borkmann
2018-08-25 0:29 ` John Fastabend
2018-08-25 1:01 ` [PATCH bpf 0/2] Two BPF sockmap fixes Alexei Starovoitov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=42a094b6-baaa-6d03-8e25-9ec7e15cee30@gmail.com \
--to=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox