From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
To: Daniele Orlandi <daniele@orlandi.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Kernel Netdev Mailing List <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: proto_unregister sleeps while atomic
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2005 01:02:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <431E1FE9.7030405@trash.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200509070026.34999.daniele@orlandi.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 650 bytes --]
Daniele Orlandi wrote:
> I'm looking at proto_unregister() in linux-2.6.13:
>
> Il calls kmem_cache_destroy() while holding proto_list_lock:
>
> void proto_unregister(struct proto *prot)
> {
> write_lock(&proto_list_lock);
>
> if (prot->slab != NULL) {
> kmem_cache_destroy(prot->slab);
>
>
> However, kmem_cache_destroy() may sleep:
>
> /* Find the cache in the chain of caches. */
> down(&cache_chain_sem);
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> Am I seeing it right?
You're right, good catch. This patch fixes it by moving the lock
down to the list-operation which it is supposed to protect.
[-- Attachment #2: x --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1111 bytes --]
[NET]: proto_unregister: fix sleeping while atomic
proto_unregister holds a lock while calling kmem_cache_destroy, which can
sleep.
Noticed by Daniele Orlandi <daniele@orlandi.com>.
Signed-off-by: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
---
commit 90fdf8bc78b52d40190766c5496a3d8c24903be8
tree 54048218d981ab263b37e0de09ad52f4bd49a000
parent 591bd554f58b7d363167760a606d2a84696772da
author Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> Wed, 07 Sep 2005 01:00:00 +0200
committer Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net> Wed, 07 Sep 2005 01:00:00 +0200
net/core/sock.c | 3 +--
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/sock.c b/net/core/sock.c
--- a/net/core/sock.c
+++ b/net/core/sock.c
@@ -1528,8 +1528,6 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(proto_register);
void proto_unregister(struct proto *prot)
{
- write_lock(&proto_list_lock);
-
if (prot->slab != NULL) {
kmem_cache_destroy(prot->slab);
prot->slab = NULL;
@@ -1551,6 +1549,7 @@ void proto_unregister(struct proto *prot
prot->twsk_slab = NULL;
}
+ write_lock(&proto_list_lock);
list_del(&prot->node);
write_unlock(&proto_list_lock);
}
next parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-06 23:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200509070026.34999.daniele@orlandi.com>
2005-09-06 23:02 ` Patrick McHardy [this message]
2005-09-06 23:07 ` proto_unregister sleeps while atomic David S. Miller
2005-09-06 23:42 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-09-07 2:48 ` David S. Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=431E1FE9.7030405@trash.net \
--to=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=daniele@orlandi.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).