From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Dumazet Subject: [PATCH] Adds sys_set_mempolicy() in include/linux/syscalls.h Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 23:46:12 +0200 Message-ID: <43308324.70403@cosmosbay.com> References: <432EF0C5.5090908@cosmosbay.com> <200509191948.55333.ak@suse.de> <432FDAC5.3040801@cosmosbay.com> <200509201830.20689.ak@suse.de> <433082DE.3060308@cosmosbay.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------050908050002000101040806" Cc: Andi Kleen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org Return-path: To: Eric Dumazet In-Reply-To: <433082DE.3060308@cosmosbay.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------050908050002000101040806 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Andi Kleen a écrit : > On Tuesday 20 September 2005 11:47, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > > > I would prefer if random code didn't mess with mempolicy internals > like this. Better just call sys_set_mempolicy() > -Andi > > OK but this prior patch seems necessary : - Adds sys_set_mempolicy() in include/linux/syscalls.h Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet --------------050908050002000101040806 Content-Type: text/plain; name="patch_add_sys_set_mempolicy" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline; filename="patch_add_sys_set_mempolicy" LS0tIGxpbnV4LTIuNi9pbmNsdWRlL2xpbnV4L3N5c2NhbGxzLmgJMjAwNS0wOS0wNiAwMToy MDoyMS4wMDAwMDAwMDAgKzAyMDAKKysrIGxpbnV4LTIuNi1lZC9pbmNsdWRlL2xpbnV4L3N5 c2NhbGxzLmgJMjAwNS0wOS0yMCAyMzo0MzowNy4wMDAwMDAwMDAgKzAyMDAKQEAgLTUwOCw1 ICs1MDgsNyBAQAogCiBhc21saW5rYWdlIGxvbmcgc3lzX2lvcHJpb19zZXQoaW50IHdoaWNo LCBpbnQgd2hvLCBpbnQgaW9wcmlvKTsKIGFzbWxpbmthZ2UgbG9uZyBzeXNfaW9wcmlvX2dl dChpbnQgd2hpY2gsIGludCB3aG8pOworYXNtbGlua2FnZSBsb25nIHN5c19zZXRfbWVtcG9s aWN5KGludCBtb2RlLCB1bnNpZ25lZCBsb25nIF9fdXNlciAqbm1hc2ssCisJCQkJCXVuc2ln bmVkIGxvbmcgbWF4bm9kZSk7CiAKICNlbmRpZgo= --------------050908050002000101040806--