netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
To: Harald Welte <laforge@netfilter.org>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] netfilter : 3 patches to boost ip_tables performance
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 15:17:51 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4332AEFF.1040105@cosmosbay.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050922125724.GJ26520@sunbeam.de.gnumonks.org>

Harald Welte a écrit :
> On Wed, Sep 21, 2005 at 11:29:13PM +0200, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> 
>>Patch 1/3
>>
>>1) No more one rwlock_t protecting the 'curtain'
> 
> 
> I have no problem with this change "per se", but with the
> implementation.
> 
> As of now, we live without any ugly #ifdef CONFIG_SMP / #endif sections
> in the code - and if possible, I would continue this good tradition.
> 
> For example the get_counters() function.  Wouldn't all the smp specific
> code (for_each_cpu(), ...)  be #defined to nothing anyway?

Well... not exactly, but you are right only the first loop (SET_COUNTER) will 
really do something. The if (cpu == curcpu) will be true but the compiler wont 
  know that, cpu and curcpu are still C variables.


> 
> And if we really need the #ifdef's, I would appreciate if those
> sectionas are as small as possible.  in get_counters() the section can
> definitely be smaller, rather than basically having the whole function
> body separate for smp and non-smp cases.

get_counters() is not critical, so I agree with you we can stick the general 
version (not the UP optimized one)

> 
> Also, how much would we loose in runtime performance if we were using a
> "rwlock_t *" even in the UP case?.  I mean, it's just one more pointer
> dereference of something that is expected to be in cache anyway, isn't
> it?  This gets rid of another huge set of #ifdefs that make the code
> unreadable and prone to errors being introduced later on.
> 

Well, in UP case, the rwlock_t is a nulldef.

I was inspired by another use of percpu data in include/linux/genhd.h
#ifdef  CONFIG_SMP
     struct disk_stats *dkstats;
#else
     struct disk_stats dkstats;
#endif

But if you dislike this, we can use pointer for all cases.

Eric

  reply	other threads:[~2005-09-22 13:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 58+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-09-19 17:09 [PATCH, netfilter] NUMA aware ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c Eric dumazet
2005-09-19 17:20 ` Eric Dumazet
2005-09-19 17:48 ` Andi Kleen
2005-09-19 19:09   ` Eric Dumazet
2005-09-20  9:47   ` Eric Dumazet
2005-09-20 16:30     ` Andi Kleen
2005-09-20 17:02       ` Eric Dumazet
2005-09-20 21:45       ` [PATCH] Adds sys_set_mempolicy() in include/linux/syscalls.h , " Eric Dumazet
2005-09-20 21:46         ` [PATCH] Adds sys_set_mempolicy() in include/linux/syscalls.h Eric Dumazet
2005-09-21 21:24           ` [PATCH 0/3] netfilter : 3 patches to boost ip_tables performance Eric Dumazet
2005-09-21 22:43             ` Christoph Lameter
2005-09-22  0:34               ` David S. Miller
2005-09-22  1:44                 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-09-22 12:11                   ` Eric Dumazet
2005-09-22 12:49                     ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-09-22 12:54                       ` Andi Kleen
2005-09-22 12:58                         ` Christoph Hellwig
2005-09-22 13:05                           ` Andi Kleen
2005-09-22 15:37                             ` Christoph Lameter
2005-09-22 15:50                               ` Eric Dumazet
2005-09-22 15:55                                 ` Christoph Lameter
2005-09-23 17:11                                 ` Harald Welte
2005-09-23 17:44                                   ` Christoph Lameter
2005-09-23 18:04                                     ` Dave Hansen
2005-09-23 17:47                                   ` Eric Dumazet
2005-09-23 18:00                                     ` Kyle Moffett
2005-09-22  4:18             ` James Morris
2005-09-22  5:07               ` Eric Dumazet
2005-09-22 13:03             ` Andi Kleen
2005-09-22 13:30               ` Eric Dumazet
2005-09-23 17:09               ` Harald Welte
2005-09-27 16:23                 ` Andi Kleen
2005-09-28  0:25                   ` Henrik Nordstrom
2005-09-28  8:32                     ` Harald Welte
2005-09-28  8:37                       ` Andi Kleen
2005-10-04 17:01                         ` Patrick McHardy
2005-10-05 16:53                           ` Andi Kleen
2005-10-07  2:38                             ` Harald Welte
2005-10-06 17:59                               ` Andi Kleen
2005-10-07 17:08                                 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-10-07 17:21                                   ` Andi Kleen
2005-10-07 17:50                                     ` Patrick McHardy
2005-09-28 10:34                       ` Henrik Nordstrom
2005-11-25 11:23             ` [PATCH] netfilter : zap get_cpu()/put_cpu() calls from ip_tables Eric Dumazet
2005-11-25 11:28               ` [PATCH (resent with the attachment !)] " Eric Dumazet
2005-11-25 18:20                 ` Patrick McHardy
2005-09-21 21:29           ` [PATCH 1/3] netfilter : 3 patches to boost ip_tables performance Eric Dumazet
2005-09-22 12:57             ` Harald Welte
2005-09-22 13:17               ` Eric Dumazet [this message]
2005-09-21 21:32           ` [PATCH 2/3] " Eric Dumazet
2005-09-22 12:48             ` Harald Welte
2005-09-22 13:05               ` Eric Dumazet
2005-09-23  4:02                 ` Willy Tarreau
2005-09-23  5:14                   ` Eric Dumazet
2005-09-23 11:33                     ` Willy Tarreau
2005-09-23 14:00                   ` Tim Mattox
2005-09-21 21:37           ` [PATCH 3/3] " Eric Dumazet
2005-09-22 12:50             ` Harald Welte

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4332AEFF.1040105@cosmosbay.com \
    --to=dada1@cosmosbay.com \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=laforge@netfilter.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@lists.netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).