From: Ovidiu Panait <ovidiu.panait.oss@gmail.com>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Cc: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
Clark Wang <xiaoning.wang@nxp.com>,
Daniel Scally <dan.scally@ideasonboard.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Emanuele Ghidoli <ghidoliemanuele@gmail.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
imx@lists.linux.dev, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>,
Stefan Klug <stefan.klug@ideasonboard.com>,
Wei Fang <wei.fang@nxp.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC net-next] net: stmmac: provide flag to disable EEE
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2026 18:28:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <434bff80-0b89-4fe5-beb2-4b70a4b600d8@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aYIXmsIG_ZJO-cg4@shell.armlinux.org.uk>
On 2/3/26 5:43 PM, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 03, 2026 at 05:42:07PM +0200, Ovidiu Panait wrote:
>>
>> Hi Russell,
>>
>> On 2/3/26 12:23 AM, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 02, 2026 at 08:54:52PM +0200, Ovidiu Panait wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Russell,
>>>>
>>>> On 11/24/25 1:27 PM, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
>>>>> Some platforms have problems when EEE is enabled, and thus need a way
>>>>> to disable stmmac EEE support. Add a flag before the other LPI related
>>>>> flags which tells stmmac to avoid populating the phylink LPI
>>>>> capabilities, which causes phylink to call phy_disable_eee() for any
>>>>> PHY that is attached to the affected phylink instance.
>>>>>
>>>>> iMX8MP is an example - the lpi_intr_o signal is wired to an OR gate
>>>>> along with the main dwmac interrupts. Since lpi_intr_o is synchronous
>>>>> to the receive clock domain, and takes four clock cycles to clear, this
>>>>> leads to interrupt storms as the interrupt remains asserted for some
>>>>> time after the LPI control and status register is read.
>>>>>
>>>>> This problem becomes worse when the receive clock from the PHY stops
>>>>> when the receive path enters LPI state - which means that lpi_intr_o
>>>>> can not deassert until the clock restarts. Since the LPI state of the
>>>>> receive path depends on the link partner, this is out of our control.
>>>>> We could disable RX clock stop at the PHY, but that doesn't get around
>>>>> the slow-to-deassert lpi_intr_o mentioned in the above paragraph.
>>>>>
>>>>> Previously, iMX8MP worked around this by disabling gigabit EEE, but
>>>>> this is insufficient - the problem is also visible at 100M speeds,
>>>>> where the receive clock is slower.
>>>>>
>>>>> There is extensive discussion and investigation in the thread linked
>>>>> below, the result of which is summarised in this commit message.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> We are seeing the same lpi_intr_o interrupt storm on the Renesas RZ/V2H
>>>> EVK (dwmac-renesas-gbeth.c). On this platform, lpi_intr_o is routed as a
>>>> separate, dedicated interrupt line to the CPU rather than being OR'd
>>>> with the main DWMAC interrupt as on iMX8MP. This corresponds to the
>>>> "eth_lpi" interrupt in the stmmac bindings:
>>>> """
>>>> - description: The interrupt that occurs when Rx exits the LPI state
>>>> const: eth_lpi
>>>> """
>>>>
>>>> Looking through the other glue drivers/device-trees, it looks to me that
>>>> every platform that defines a separate "eth_lpi" irq might have the
>>>> interrupt storm problem.
>>>
>>> That is highly likely.
>>>
>>>> To fix this issue on these platforms, rather than disabling EEE
>>>> altogether, would it be possible to just not request the eth_lpi
>>>> interrupt and let EEE continue to work? Perhaps a new flag could let
>>>> each platform decide.
>>>
>>> Yes, because lpi_intr_o serves no purpose from a software point of
>>> view - see the commit message below for the details. I do like
>>> removing code from stmmac :)
>>>
>>>> If not, maybe this patch could be merged to add the flag that disables
>>>> EEE and I will just send a patch to disable EEE on our platforms as well.
>>>
>>> We still need the flag to disable EEE for platforms where lpi_intr_o is
>>> logically OR'd with the other interrupts, so there's no way to ignore
>>> its persistent assertion.
>>>
>>> 8<===
>>> From: "Russell King (Oracle)" <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
>>> Subject: [PATCH net-next] net: stmmac: remove support for lpi_intr_o
>>>
>>> The dwmac databook for v3.74a states that lpi_intr_o is a sideband
>>> signal which should be used to ungate the application clock, and this
>>> signal is synchronous to the receive clock. The receive clock can run
>>> at 2.5, 25 or 125MHz depending on the media speed, and can stop under
>>> the control of the link partner. This means that the time it takes to
>>> clear is dependent on the negotiated media speed, and thus can be 8,
>>> 40, or 400ns after reading the LPI control and status register.
>>>
>>> It has been observed with some aggressive link partners, this clock
>>> can stop while lpi_intr_o is still asserted, meaning that the signal
>>> remains asserted for an indefinite period that the local system has
>>> no direct control over.
>>>
>>> The LPI interrupts will still be signalled through the main interrupt
>>> path in any case, and this path is not dependent on the receive clock.
>>>
>>> This, since we do not gate the application clock, and the chances of
>>> adding clock gating in the future are slim due to the clocks being
>>> ill-defined, lpi_intr_o serves no useful purpose. Remove the code which
>>> requests the interrupt, and all associated code.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@armlinux.org.uk>
>>
>> Thanks for fixing this. I did some testing on the Renesas RZ/V2H board
>> with this patch and didn't see any issues:
>>
>> Tested-by: Ovidiu Panait <ovidiu.panait.rb@renesas.com>
>
> Would you say this is a regression or a new problem?
I don't think it is a regression per se. AFAICT this behavior was always
present as long as EEE is enabled, but I only noticed it after I changed
the network switch the board was connected to.
Thanks,
Ovidiu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-03 16:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-24 11:27 [PATCH RFC net-next] net: stmmac: provide flag to disable EEE Russell King (Oracle)
2026-02-02 18:54 ` Ovidiu Panait
2026-02-02 22:23 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2026-02-03 0:17 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2026-02-03 23:18 ` Laurent Pinchart
2026-02-08 23:30 ` Laurent Pinchart
2026-02-03 15:42 ` Ovidiu Panait
2026-02-03 15:43 ` Russell King (Oracle)
2026-02-03 16:28 ` Ovidiu Panait [this message]
2026-02-03 16:51 ` Russell King (Oracle)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=434bff80-0b89-4fe5-beb2-4b70a4b600d8@gmail.com \
--to=ovidiu.panait.oss@gmail.com \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=dan.scally@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=ghidoliemanuele@gmail.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=kieran.bingham@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
--cc=stefan.klug@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=wei.fang@nxp.com \
--cc=xiaoning.wang@nxp.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox