From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Patrick McHardy Subject: Re: [PATCH] Merge __load_pointer() and load_pointer() in net/core/filter.c; kernel 2.6.14 Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2005 17:19:12 +0100 Message-ID: <436A3880.9000104@trash.net> References: <5b1bc8f2a7f34523b323fc1b58ef4c26.kjak@ispwest.com> <20051103065809.GC27232@gaz.sfgoth.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Kris Katterjohn , Herbert Xu , jschlst@samba.org, davem@davemloft.net, acme@ghostprotocols.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: To: Mitchell Blank Jr In-Reply-To: <20051103065809.GC27232@gaz.sfgoth.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Mitchell Blank Jr wrote: > Kris Katterjohn wrote: > >>>So I guess use my patch and take "inline" off? What do you think? > > Well the original author presumably thought that the fast-path of > load_pointer() was critical enough to keep inline (since it can be run many > times per packet) So they made the deliberate choice of separating it > into two functions - one inline, one non-inline. Exactly. __load_pointer is only called rarely, while load_pointer is called whenever data needs to be read from the packet. It shouldn't be changed without any justification.