From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>
Subject: Re: Broadcom 43xx first results
Date: Mon, 05 Dec 2005 13:54:00 -0500
Message-ID: <43948CC8.6000107@pobox.com>
References: <E1Eiyw4-0003Ab-FW@www1.emo.freenet-rz.de>	<20051205190038.04b7b7c1@griffin.suse.cz>	<1133806444.4498.35.camel@gimli>	<43948B13.2090509@pobox.com> <20051205194923.3b868d50@griffin.suse.cz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: netdev@nospam.otaku42.de, mbuesch@freenet.de,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bcm43xx-dev@lists.berlios.de,
	NetDev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner+glk-linux-kernel-3=40m.gmane.org-S1751403AbVLESyR@vger.kernel.org>
To: Jiri Benc <jbenc@suse.cz>
In-Reply-To: <20051205194923.3b868d50@griffin.suse.cz>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org

Jiri Benc wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 13:46:43 -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> 
>>Use the stack that's already in the kernel.
>>
>>Encouraging otherwise hinders continued wireless progress under Linux.

> There is nothing like a "802.11 stack" currently in the kernel,
> regardless what James Ketrenos is saying. Sorry.


Complete bullshit.  There is obviously 802.11 generic code in the 
kernel, and that's what _I_ am saying, because it's true.

If it doesn't support your favorite wireless chipset, then submit patches.

	Jeff